[PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc@XXX to
XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller@XXX.

Boot tested on:
 r8a73a4/ape6evm
 r8a7740/armadillo800evb
 r8a7778/bockw
 r8a7790/lager
 r8a7791/koelsch
 r8a7791/porter
 r8a7793/gose
 sh73a9/kzm9g

Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
 evm2/kzm9d
 r8a7789/marzen

Simon Horman (9):
  ARM: dts: emev2: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a73a4: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7740: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7778: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7779: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7790: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7791: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7793: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: sh73a0: update PFC node name to pin-controller

 arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi  | 2 +-
 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.

Boot tested on:
 r8a73a4/ape6evm
 r8a7740/armadillo800evb
 r8a7778/bockw
 r8a7790/lager
 r8a7791/koelsch
 r8a7791/porter
 r8a7793/gose
 sh73a9/kzm9g

Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
 evm2/kzm9d
 r8a7789/marzen

Simon Horman (9):
  ARM: dts: emev2: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a73a4: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7740: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7778: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7779: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7790: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7791: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: r8a7793: update PFC node name to pin-controller
  ARM: dts: sh73a0: update PFC node name to pin-controller

 arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi  | 2 +-
 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 1/9] ARM: dts: emev2: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e0140200.pfc and pfc@e0140200 to
e0140200.pin-controller and pin-controller@e0140200.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
index 0124faf175c8..42ea246e71cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
 		clock-names = "sclk";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e0140200 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e0140200 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-emev2";
 		reg = <0xe0140200 0x100>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 1/9] ARM: dts: emev2: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e0140200.pfc and pfc at e0140200 to
e0140200.pin-controller and pin-controller at e0140200.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
index 0124faf175c8..42ea246e71cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
 		clock-names = "sclk";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e0140200 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e0140200 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-emev2";
 		reg = <0xe0140200 0x100>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: r8a73a4: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
index 1f5c9f6dddba..310222634570 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
 		power-domains = <&pd_c4>;
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e6050000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e6050000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a73a4";
 		reg = <0 0xe6050000 0 0x9000>;
 		gpio-controller;
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: r8a73a4: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc at e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6050000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
index 1f5c9f6dddba..310222634570 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
 		power-domains = <&pd_c4>;
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e6050000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e6050000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a73a4";
 		reg = <0 0xe6050000 0 0x9000>;
 		gpio-controller;
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: r8a7740: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
index 34159a8349de..d37d22682a63 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e6050000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e6050000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7740";
 		reg = <0xe6050000 0x8000>,
 		      <0xe605800c 0x20>;
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: r8a7740: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc at e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6050000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
index 34159a8349de..d37d22682a63 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e6050000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e6050000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7740";
 		reg = <0xe6050000 0x8000>,
 		      <0xe605800c 0x20>;
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: r8a7778: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc@fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller@fffc0000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
index 1e93c94a9eac..8f3156c0e575 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 		interrupt-controller;
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@fffc0000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@fffc0000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7778";
 		reg = <0xfffc0000 0x118>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: r8a7778: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc at fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller at fffc0000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
index 1e93c94a9eac..8f3156c0e575 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 		interrupt-controller;
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at fffc0000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at fffc0000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7778";
 		reg = <0xfffc0000 0x118>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: r8a7779: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc@fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller@fffc0000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
index ae2d9a9c65af..8ee0b2ca5d39 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@fffc0000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@fffc0000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7779";
 		reg = <0xfffc0000 0x23c>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: r8a7779: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc at fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller at fffc0000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
index ae2d9a9c65af..8ee0b2ca5d39 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at fffc0000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at fffc0000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7779";
 		reg = <0xfffc0000 0x23c>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: r8a7790: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
index 99269aaca6fc..416956a42c93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
 		max-frequency = <97500000>;
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e6060000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e6060000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7790";
 		reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: r8a7790: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc at e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6060000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
index 99269aaca6fc..416956a42c93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
 		max-frequency = <97500000>;
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e6060000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e6060000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7790";
 		reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: r8a7791: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
index 4d0c2ce59900..540c5b27b842 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e6060000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e6060000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7791";
 		reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: r8a7791: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc at e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6060000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
index 4d0c2ce59900..540c5b27b842 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e6060000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e6060000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7791";
 		reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: r8a7793: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
index 4de6041d61f9..728b5bca5bdb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e6060000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e6060000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7793";
 		reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: r8a7793: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc at e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6060000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
index 4de6041d61f9..728b5bca5bdb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e6060000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e6060000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7793";
 		reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
 	};
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: sh73a0: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
index 6b01ab354e88..4ea5c5a16c57 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc@e6050000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller@e6050000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-sh73a0";
 		reg = <0xe6050000 0x8000>,
 		      <0xe605801c 0x1c>;
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

[PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: sh73a0: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.

My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc at e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6050000.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
index 6b01ab354e88..4ea5c5a16c57 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	pfc: pfc at e6050000 {
+	pfc: pin-controller at e6050000 {
 		compatible = "renesas,pfc-sh73a0";
 		reg = <0xe6050000 0x8000>,
 		      <0xe605801c 0x1c>;
-- 
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Simon,

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Simon Horman
<horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
>
> My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc@XXX to
> XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller@XXX.
>
> Boot tested on:
>  r8a73a4/ape6evm
>  r8a7740/armadillo800evb
>  r8a7778/bockw
>  r8a7790/lager
>  r8a7791/koelsch
>  r8a7791/porter
>  r8a7793/gose
>  sh73a9/kzm9g
>
> Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
>  evm2/kzm9d
>  r8a7789/marzen
>
> Simon Horman (9):

For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Simon,

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Simon Horman
<horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
>
> My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
> XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.
>
> Boot tested on:
>  r8a73a4/ape6evm
>  r8a7740/armadillo800evb
>  r8a7778/bockw
>  r8a7790/lager
>  r8a7791/koelsch
>  r8a7791/porter
>  r8a7793/gose
>  sh73a9/kzm9g
>
> Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
>  evm2/kzm9d
>  r8a7789/marzen
>
> Simon Horman (9):

For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Simon Horman
> <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> > node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> > unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> > generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
> >
> > My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> > logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc@XXX to
> > XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller@XXX.
> >
> > Boot tested on:
> >  r8a73a4/ape6evm
> >  r8a7740/armadillo800evb
> >  r8a7778/bockw
> >  r8a7790/lager
> >  r8a7791/koelsch
> >  r8a7791/porter
> >  r8a7793/gose
> >  sh73a9/kzm9g
> >
> > Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
> >  evm2/kzm9d
> >  r8a7789/marzen
> >
> > Simon Horman (9):
> 
> For the whole series:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks, I have queued these up.

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Simon Horman
> <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> > node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> > unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> > generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
> >
> > My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> > logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
> > XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.
> >
> > Boot tested on:
> >  r8a73a4/ape6evm
> >  r8a7740/armadillo800evb
> >  r8a7778/bockw
> >  r8a7790/lager
> >  r8a7791/koelsch
> >  r8a7791/porter
> >  r8a7793/gose
> >  sh73a9/kzm9g
> >
> > Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
> >  evm2/kzm9d
> >  r8a7789/marzen
> >
> > Simon Horman (9):
> 
> For the whole series:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks, I have queued these up.

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
> 
> My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc@XXX to
> XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller@XXX.
> 
> Boot tested on:
>  r8a73a4/ape6evm
>  r8a7740/armadillo800evb
>  r8a7778/bockw
>  r8a7790/lager
>  r8a7791/koelsch
>  r8a7791/porter
>  r8a7793/gose
>  sh73a9/kzm9g
> 
> Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
>  evm2/kzm9d
>  r8a7789/marzen

I have now tested this on r8a7789/marzen

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
> 
> My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
> XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.
> 
> Boot tested on:
>  r8a73a4/ape6evm
>  r8a7740/armadillo800evb
>  r8a7778/bockw
>  r8a7790/lager
>  r8a7791/koelsch
>  r8a7791/porter
>  r8a7793/gose
>  sh73a9/kzm9g
> 
> Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
>  evm2/kzm9d
>  r8a7789/marzen

I have now tested this on r8a7789/marzen