From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7578FC433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3534D64DDD for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231181AbhA1MBC (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:01:02 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com ([209.85.167.180]:45283 "EHLO mail-oi1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231419AbhA1MAH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:00:07 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f180.google.com with SMTP id g69so5685338oib.12; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:59:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kAP4N1JvamS8Mu0q+wzDG5MIcLJh8DB6Gbuwj+1o0xk=; b=Gfr0N2ENJt5YKMtVKAA0iAP3BwXgJ904EohZVfBzR88ha3zdm3BaMYvJVmwEiatQkX VZBqAYqpH0LNMrpKsaTQcRrn7As/QgBSy1gSbRjYQvLizCGuyN8CsASm2i9sLHslvEZh vduZy/OzvxrkhZTDUCHt5Px9QDB2CiPXdzEi2nEHigrjp/C22Wu2mol3qLtaO0KTFaVL yFcZU6sP95Ukz8J/JvCyDCcnCPd5aSBC1rhqA4eMo7gm+eYAj5UzhHODp1kLNIBZrWB0 dmHwRMaY1iIEfHtUddjG4YrlvOlQlgxlxkj1QBNuWZz0Snpb4+ruibYEzesbqV0lzklD 1r7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DPIwZd8jSPr9oXIf62TJXf8LbWVtOZplgfbK0m9DcwBuIs0RE Xi4N3ODOT0U3d8Iw50xumlrTWYHaJPcSycqkX0aksWsDs0E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrT+Kg8nyfyKS3C+Z0key3XnUxUjStwPy5R868F5Smv4QzgDQQfF0cXgHDjhCU+QdrsluppxYf9QBXRKwmEz4= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4e88:: with SMTP id c8mr6196722oiy.148.1611835166537; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:59:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210128111343.2295888-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20210128113353.GN963@ninjato> In-Reply-To: <20210128113353.GN963@ninjato> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:59:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Document ROHM BR24G01 To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Linux I2C , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux-Renesas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus > > EEPROM. > > What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback > of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm > handling somewhen)? Good question. The datasheets look similar. Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using "Cu wire bonding". Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds