From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6382DB6 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 08:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com (mail-vs1-f66.google.com [209.85.217.66]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF41466 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 08:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id z130-v6so9757182vsc.7 for ; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 01:25:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> In-Reply-To: <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 10:25:22 +0200 Message-ID: To: James Bottomley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi James, Thanks for your patch! On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley wrote: > From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: James Bottomley > Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting = email > addresses > > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishi= ng that > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Sinc= e > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the pa= tch > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected= by > the project to correct this ambiguity. > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants inclu= de: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political att= acks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others=E2=80=99 private information, such as a physical or = electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit perm= ission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k= .org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. Bu= t when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like t= hat. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE875C65C30 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 08:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8602088F for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 08:25:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D8602088F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727593AbeJGPcF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2018 11:32:05 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com ([209.85.217.66]:42194 "EHLO mail-vs1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726402AbeJGPcF (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2018 11:32:05 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id e126so3776352vsc.9 for ; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 01:25:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tAH3oU8DzZf2Yt28VRobDQAHezGYoFE58HpVRwFCDVM=; b=qEyBXRFXTsTsgioNJ8LfAJrZRoA4GveRIFu8SNdWeEGRVp+yhwO8xuv/e0R3SBEMSB 5pWt08s5y0BqE03fOV4+y9pPNH0syHBcUCpeAxyNNbDk1WiKGqOZ2ronMyttIKYJ9U2C sMGKamIjPDfw7PaZl8ZYQT+B2eWAJ7BD049LzuWlt4dKNGY/efpJzMH6OaHpGNVgAC31 AR5wwft9IHDjs4S8dUa71kasw5CZad9m8aE8P+02qube+3qXVRZAeshh84u107QIVQB6 BxxjEOb5sFmtDFW8MDromoJA6sJKtX6ahup3OBiXPKSg1wq/50T4u489ny3tyDv70Y5n UjRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiQx5pu9KSlCQVXLFfPUnzWhr3ZM6sommGZOkyx7HFtMPybMyoI HtWKZ3LU3VeSXv/7Va4hpQI4NPAqTIBHDNzJhHIqaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61TZ8rkjD+Jo18bXvwQI0R1TXhp/EE1Dmn1k4u24giPlAgPlb1AmBijxfXh0W4kJeHFiWTTeeyPjm9432xZ1z0= X-Received: by 2002:a67:d69e:: with SMTP id o30mr4585466vsj.11.1538900734661; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 01:25:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> In-Reply-To: <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 10:25:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses To: James Bottomley Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi James, Thanks for your patch! On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley wrote: > From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: James Bottomley > Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email > addresses > > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing that > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by > the project to correct this ambiguity. > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds