* b4 not finding explicitly specified patch
@ 2021-01-21 10:05 Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-20 22:06 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-01-21 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev; +Cc: users, tools
Hi Konstantin,
$ b4 am 20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com -P_
Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak%40google.com
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/lkml
Analyzing 63 messages in the thread
---
Specified msgid is not present in the series, cannot cherrypick
$
Without "-P_", it downloads a series not containing the patch I want.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: b4 not finding explicitly specified patch 2021-01-21 10:05 b4 not finding explicitly specified patch Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-05-20 22:06 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev 2021-05-21 7:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Ryabitsev @ 2021-05-20 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: users, tools On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Konstantin, > > $ b4 am 20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com -P_ > Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak%40google.com > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/lkml > Analyzing 63 messages in the thread > --- > Specified msgid is not present in the series, cannot cherrypick > $ > > Without "-P_", it downloads a series not containing the patch I want. Well, only 5 months later, but I do have a fix for this in the current 0.7-dev: $ b4 am -o/tmp 20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com -P_ Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak%40google.com Analyzing 5 messages in the thread Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... --- ✓ [PATCH v1] driver: core: Make fw_devlink=on more forgiving --- ✓ Signed: DKIM/google.com --- Total patches: 1 (cherrypicked: <20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com>) --- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com Base: not found git am /tmp/20210121_saravanak_driver_core_make_fw_devlink_on_more_forgiving.mbx Best regards, -K ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: b4 not finding explicitly specified patch 2021-05-20 22:06 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev @ 2021-05-21 7:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2021-05-21 12:28 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-05-21 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konstantin Ryabitsev; +Cc: users, tools Hi Konstantin, On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:06 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > $ b4 am 20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com -P_ > > Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak%40google.com > > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/lkml > > Analyzing 63 messages in the thread > > --- > > Specified msgid is not present in the series, cannot cherrypick > > $ > > > > Without "-P_", it downloads a series not containing the patch I want. > > Well, only 5 months later, but I do have a fix for this in the current Off-by-one error: 4 months ;-) > 0.7-dev: > > $ b4 am -o/tmp 20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com -P_ > Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak%40google.com > Analyzing 5 messages in the thread > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > --- > ✓ [PATCH v1] driver: core: Make fw_devlink=on more forgiving > --- > ✓ Signed: DKIM/google.com > --- > Total patches: 1 (cherrypicked: <20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com>) > --- > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210121082248.883253-1-saravanak@google.com > Base: not found > git am /tmp/20210121_saravanak_driver_core_make_fw_devlink_on_more_forgiving.mbx Thanks, confirmed! Note that without "-P_", it still downloads the series not containing the patch I specified. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: b4 not finding explicitly specified patch 2021-05-21 7:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-05-21 12:28 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev 2021-05-21 13:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Ryabitsev @ 2021-05-21 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: users, tools On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:06:20AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Well, only 5 months later, but I do have a fix for this in the current > > Off-by-one error: 4 months ;-) Oh, I'm using a special "Pandemic Perceptive Timekeeping" where for each elapsed 4 weeks you add an extra one. :) > Note that without "-P_", it still downloads the series not containing the patch > I specified. I'm not sure if I can fix that, because that thread is a bit wonky. You will notice that we have: [PATCH v1 0/5] ... [PATCH v1 5/5] \- Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] \- [TEST PATCH v1] b4 is really built around retrieving series, and here we can't figure out where in the series [TEST PATCH v1] belongs. I *believe* the intent here is to replace [PATCH v1 5/5], but it doesn't have any counters on it, so we end up ignoring it because we already have a [PATCH v1 1/5]. I'm not sure what the *proper* way to deal with this case is -- at least in the absence of -P that specifies "I want *that* exact msgid". -K ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: b4 not finding explicitly specified patch 2021-05-21 12:28 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev @ 2021-05-21 13:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2021-06-07 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-05-21 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konstantin Ryabitsev; +Cc: users, tools Hi Konstantin, On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:06:20AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Note that without "-P_", it still downloads the series not containing the patch > > I specified. > > I'm not sure if I can fix that, because that thread is a bit wonky. You will > notice that we have: > > [PATCH v1 0/5] > ... > [PATCH v1 5/5] > \- Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] > \- [TEST PATCH v1] > > b4 is really built around retrieving series, and here we can't figure out > where in the series [TEST PATCH v1] belongs. I *believe* the intent here is to > replace [PATCH v1 5/5], but it doesn't have any counters on it, so we end up > ignoring it because we already have a [PATCH v1 1/5]. Yeah, it's a weird case ;-) > I'm not sure what the *proper* way to deal with this case is -- at least in > the absence of -P that specifies "I want *that* exact msgid". Fair enough. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: b4 not finding explicitly specified patch 2021-05-21 13:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-06-07 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2021-06-07 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konstantin Ryabitsev; +Cc: users, tools Hi Konstantin, On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:18 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev > <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:06:20AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Note that without "-P_", it still downloads the series not containing the patch > > > I specified. > > > > I'm not sure if I can fix that, because that thread is a bit wonky. You will > > notice that we have: > > > > [PATCH v1 0/5] > > ... > > [PATCH v1 5/5] > > \- Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] > > \- [TEST PATCH v1] > > > > b4 is really built around retrieving series, and here we can't figure out > > where in the series [TEST PATCH v1] belongs. I *believe* the intent here is to > > replace [PATCH v1 5/5], but it doesn't have any counters on it, so we end up > > ignoring it because we already have a [PATCH v1 1/5]. > > Yeah, it's a weird case ;-) Just ran into another weird case: $ b4 am 1622957313-321-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622957313-321-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic%40gmail.com Analyzing 28 messages in the thread Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... --- ✓ [PATCH RFC 1/2] m68k: io_mm.h: conditionalize ISA address translation on Atari ✓ [PATCH RFC 2/2] m68k: setup_mm.c: set isa_sex for Atari if ATARI_ROM_ISA not used --- ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com --- Total patches: 2 --- Cover: ./20210602_schmitzmic_fix_m68k_multiplatform_isa_support.cover Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622611267-15825-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com Base: not found (applies clean to current tree) git am ./20210602_schmitzmic_fix_m68k_multiplatform_isa_support.mbx No, that's the RFC. $ b4 am -P_ 1622957313-321-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622957313-321-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic%40gmail.com Analyzing 1 messages in the thread Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... --- ✓ [PATCH] m68k: Fix multiplatform ISA support --- ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com --- Total patches: 1 (cherrypicked: <1622957313-321-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com>) --- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622957313-321-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com Base: not found (applies clean to current tree) git am ./20210606_schmitzmic_m68k_fix_multiplatform_isa_support.mbx Yeah, that's the one I want. At least the chain "RFC" -> implicit v1 -> "v2" -> "v3" ... is less fuzzy than "[PATCH v1 5/5]" -> "[TEST PATCH v1]"... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-07 7:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-01-21 10:05 b4 not finding explicitly specified patch Geert Uytterhoeven 2021-05-20 22:06 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev 2021-05-21 7:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2021-05-21 12:28 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev 2021-05-21 13:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2021-06-07 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.