From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754344Ab3KURnD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:43:03 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:55885 "EHLO mail-pb0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373Ab3KURm7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:42:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5283A000.8090007@gmail.com> <1384859554-27268-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <20131121122148.1B43DC40A2C@trevor.secretlab.ca> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:42:58 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: A4sKIRKd-jgq-UAy-ZHIAfiBMCQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt: Handle passed/built-in DT selection in early_init_dt_scan() From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Rob Herring Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > I really don't like saying one arch can have built-in dtb and another > one can't. Either we allow it or we don't. If this is a bad feature, > then why did we let multiple arches implement it. ... and did we put it in asm-generic, so now _every_ arch has __dtb_start. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds