From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua1-f65.google.com ([209.85.222.65]:44948 "EHLO mail-ua1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726986AbeISPFS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:05:18 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f65.google.com with SMTP id m11-v6so2339212uao.11 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:28:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180918122340.5478-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20180919091330.yxnehm2fy5llb2bb@verge.net.au> <7d214a60-e703-c53d-5c98-5da29c34650f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7d214a60-e703-c53d-5c98-5da29c34650f@gmail.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:28:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] ARM: shmobile: Rework the PMIC IRQ line quirk To: Marek Vasut Cc: Simon Horman , Linux ARM , Linux-Renesas , Marek Vasut , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Wolfram Sang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Marek, On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/19/2018 11:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > Marek, these days checkpatch complains if the author of the patch does not > > have a signed offline, and the inconsistency between your > > from and Sign-off the email address trips that check. > > > > Could you consider either a) enhancing checkpatch or b) using I'm the one who enhanced checkpatch with the new check ;-) > > the same address twice? No need to take any action for this patch. > > Sure, do you know if there's some tweak to git config , so git > send-email uses the m.v+foo@ From address ? Git send-email uses the address from user.email in gitconfig, just like git commit. However, I see you're using Gmail's SMTP server. That one replaces the From-line in the header by your primary email address as configured in Gmail (even if you have configured Gmail to know the other address is yours, too). I use my ISP's SMTP server to work around that. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:28:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH V6] ARM: shmobile: Rework the PMIC IRQ line quirk In-Reply-To: <7d214a60-e703-c53d-5c98-5da29c34650f@gmail.com> References: <20180918122340.5478-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20180919091330.yxnehm2fy5llb2bb@verge.net.au> <7d214a60-e703-c53d-5c98-5da29c34650f@gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Marek, On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/19/2018 11:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > Marek, these days checkpatch complains if the author of the patch does not > > have a signed offline, and the inconsistency between your > > from and Sign-off the email address trips that check. > > > > Could you consider either a) enhancing checkpatch or b) using I'm the one who enhanced checkpatch with the new check ;-) > > the same address twice? No need to take any action for this patch. > > Sure, do you know if there's some tweak to git config , so git > send-email uses the m.v+foo@ From address ? Git send-email uses the address from user.email in gitconfig, just like git commit. However, I see you're using Gmail's SMTP server. That one replaces the From-line in the header by your primary email address as configured in Gmail (even if you have configured Gmail to know the other address is yours, too). I use my ISP's SMTP server to work around that. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds