From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com ([209.85.216.194]:48396 "EHLO mail-qt0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752449AbdKGJfZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 04:35:25 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f194.google.com with SMTP id f8so14398099qta.5 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 01:35:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171101103452.7491-11-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> References: <20171101103452.7491-1-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20171101103452.7491-11-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:35:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/15] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: Point VSPI via FCPVI to IPMMU-VP0/1 To: Simon Horman Cc: Linux-Renesas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Magnus Damm , Magnus Damm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > From: Magnus Damm > > Hook up the FCPVI devices to allow use of VSPI with > IPMMU-VP0 and IPMMU-VP1. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1.dtsi > @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ > iommus = <&ipmmu_vp0 1>; > }; > > +&fcpvi1 { > + iommus = <&ipmmu_vp0 9>; > +}; Do we sort labels alphabetically? Or do we follow the order of the original targets? (Random comment that may apply elsewhere, too) > + > &fcpvd2 { > iommus = <&ipmmu_vi0 10>; > }; Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:35:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 10/15] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: Point VSPI via FCPVI to IPMMU-VP0/1 In-Reply-To: <20171101103452.7491-11-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> References: <20171101103452.7491-1-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20171101103452.7491-11-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > From: Magnus Damm > > Hook up the FCPVI devices to allow use of VSPI with > IPMMU-VP0 and IPMMU-VP1. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-es1.dtsi > @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ > iommus = <&ipmmu_vp0 1>; > }; > > +&fcpvi1 { > + iommus = <&ipmmu_vp0 9>; > +}; Do we sort labels alphabetically? Or do we follow the order of the original targets? (Random comment that may apply elsewhere, too) > + > &fcpvd2 { > iommus = <&ipmmu_vi0 10>; > }; Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds