From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC601BA0 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-f193.google.com (mail-oi1-f193.google.com [209.85.167.193]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6077ED for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f193.google.com with SMTP id a128so2018665oib.1 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 05:25:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190614130456.6c339c01@coco.lan> <1560528994.27102.34.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190614144836.0a71ebe5@coco.lan> <20190617103115.670bf968@coco.lan> <20190619075351.GP28859@kadam> <20190619113902.76bd169a@coco.lan> <20190619144808.GI21753@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <1560959179.4729.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190619162359.GV5316@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190619162359.GV5316@sirena.org.uk> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:24:55 +0200 Message-ID: To: Mark Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: ksummit , James Bottomley , media-submaintainers@linuxtv.org, kbuild@01.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [media-submaintainers] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Pull network and Patch Acceptance Consistency List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Mark, On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:24 PM Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:46:19AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 17:48 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > It's not automatic though, if it depends on a Kconfig option that is > > > disabled by default. The built bots can enable it, while users would > > > ignore it. That being said, having it as a per-tree build bot option > > > should work as well. > > > I really don't think well made build bots would enable this. The > > problem with -Werror is it's single threaded on the first problem. > > What a generic build bot wants to do is compile the entire tree and > > then diff the output to find the additional warnings for everything. I > > could see a tree specific build bot being more interested (until the > > build fails on an unrelated subsystem). > > If you're doing build coverage you can always use make -k and still > build everything but yeah. While that does allow building most individual components, you will fail to catch link errors and section mismatches. Still better than nothing, of course.... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds