From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751941AbdATKev (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:34:51 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:32949 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751661AbdATKes (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:34:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1484832930-7373-1-git-send-email-gidisrael@gmail.com> <201701200401.y4CyY8xU%fengguang.wu@intel.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:34:46 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q-tEXFVpvH36iu1Jw0zPzrggimg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: replaced gcc specific macros with ones from compiler.h To: "Gideon D'souza" Cc: kbuild test robot , "kbuild-all@01.org" , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Ungerer , linux-m68k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Gideon, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Gideon D'souza wrote: >> Gideon: what exactly did you use to send this email series? > I used git format-patch and then send-email on my Fedora 24 system. > > I did : > > git format-patch HEAD^^ # this generated two patches for the two commits I made > git send-email --to ... ~/patches/0001- .... #sent first patch > git send-email --to ... ~/patches/0002- ....#sent second patch > > Yes, I sent each patch individually. Should I have just passed the directory? You should pass all patches at once, so they are properly tracked as a series: git send-email --to ... ~/patches/0* Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds