From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE4BC433E0 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6F222F9 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729580AbhAKLDR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:03:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:42391 "EHLO mail-ot1-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728725AbhAKLDO (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:03:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 11so16471641oty.9; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 03:02:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MHCmvXvpGHFVb33mpUBJ2Js02o/EFIeyUQRQPV9z6gY=; b=semtb+3PUmv/aRBvc189fiRhk/pGuHpE2MQ+0ka127vjxe/IbNnwdf8B8CguSRb2sS ge/2MAvKpXLWtN+8uId4tZzA+MpH+QPwDB9D+NEG7DHqTXLV9s+iUHMVgzdFp9Kt5oWY I0jF+Lk1VshivMHRFi1rD8M++yDuO88bQwcQ8fwfRUuilVp7I5nIEqoFcny8SrfYOIgf G/i5E4gb4QR13o2VjP1chvAU9ZDHevvujW9Qdyd013pZcmLboGZ1U3GVFP9LT/wLuzZY DPTQvrFyuRGhEX7RrL4H43XiFsML7ZZisdf6WyQEV59fO6lL1iItkHH71Gs/l4kOONc5 wQcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308ghNTpKfKCldurV6lTVKLEnjX2Yae1rvq1W7odEZDq/7Ucp+Z 1FUFgPlbaxrDn2AvZDos4hQATrOXF032BjPFZBY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykrrMStMJLiiXGwsvMMzaA/CL/vYTUsewatwlV9ffmERCTEPv9/AX+Ak8IvfWQEmIUOn8F8btCmKSctcTMP1Q= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:c01:: with SMTP id 1mr10417143otr.107.1610362953195; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 03:02:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <82487.1609006918@turing-police> <160997457204.3687425.15622431721220616573.b4-ty@chromium.org> <122278.1610362619@turing-police> In-Reply-To: <122278.1610362619@turing-police> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:02:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: fix gcc 11 indigestion with plugins... To: =?UTF-8?Q?Valdis_Kl=C4=93tnieks?= Cc: Kees Cook , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josh Poimboeuf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Valdis, On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:57 AM Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:47:23 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven said: > > I guess this is the cause of the new "warning: invalid suffix on > > literal; C++11 requires a space between literal and string macro > > [-Wliteral-suffix]" with gcc 4.9 or 5.4? > > Well, we fixed a #error, and picked up a warning. That's progress. ;) > > It's probably related. I'm just having a hard time understanding why 4.9 and 5.4 > whine about the lack of a space, while 8.3 and 11 didn't complain... > > I'll see if I can cook up a patch that newer gcc are still happy with. You able > to easily test with 4.9 or 5.4? No, I don't have 4.9 or 5.4 cross-compilers anymore. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds