From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF89C54FD3 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D0921D94 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726147AbgDTJ2J (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:28:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:40061 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgDTJ2I (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:28:08 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id i27so7479698ota.7; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XArWxGkJ+VyTPp7Wsn4dbWWlVRq/sh+tie0xFdY8Wzs=; b=ojOaIyFu+LU9btDCed/uPxLyuqV3WUmujQu0m5AcjAILyL5Lvg19rOd4HBy+AACJsv LvaDBqXIrdve1aYS97NgjA3vkNNlp6aP6nVfk5G/6UZnWwojgx3DoKWXwMRtf9HFQKxB ACwr5vITVf6jpzLXwT9+0L/m2rJTsQ1rzuF7BFfdzYL0UhU80r1tyJNIjlgsHseXjfmp yfLbFKY35IikPdVZjTgtE6CO4w9K1BT2+M2E2ufuz2jnEyhm8FV4nZD/sVbyOIAhychr j32zTqHpLkEjHh9goXjaiXberPImMq65mR8VvwhvR5hjmAkHPybtH6kXTaiNuDpwt84m WicQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY8m7mN/kENFZS0JJkvdWpjS/r7pqSuLm1HAhvmPsvIHIBgDZaf MIg5p3avFftXPITniRfIpA3ofK1aKBnAIHhY+LA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjsC6EXYlE5GmPZ4cHorgIglv7peKg70tltLFRlUNMnXipnoVRB6R66Yu9R4xLAwziPHJaRnQ/4in6/miu0rc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3104:: with SMTP id b4mr5224618ots.250.1587374887535; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Laura Abbott , Sumit Semwal , Sakari Ailus , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Christophe Leroy , Linux-Arch , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390 , Peter Zijlstra , linuxppc-dev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI Development , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Linux MM , Linux IOMMU , bpf , Robin Murphy , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Sender: "iommu" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-hyperv-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Airlie , DRI Development , Linux MM , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Sumit Semwal , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , Wei Liu , Stephen Hemminger , the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra , Laura Abbott , Nitin Gupta , Daniel Vetter , Haiyang Zhang , linaro-mm-sig-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org, bpf , Linux ARM , Christophe Leroy , Robin Murphy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBBBC54FCF for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7D921D79 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4B7D921D79 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F1CB88E0005; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:28:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EA6258E0003; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:28:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D94828E0005; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:28:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0248.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.248]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9008E0003 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 05:28:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7816C180ACF84 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76727707056.28.way50_813dcca304834 X-HE-Tag: way50_813dcca304834 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4538 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com (mail-ot1-f67.google.com [209.85.210.67]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id z17so7497763oto.4 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XArWxGkJ+VyTPp7Wsn4dbWWlVRq/sh+tie0xFdY8Wzs=; b=DtgHuuARGV8IOD3hsFJ1ufNp7bMt3zoSykIHxIPzeDjprahHMMNpwDMCWOYMnKnAS7 v2GFRbonxnkT4NqmDtTRbiAxcr7cKDGW8muT21RnfftklJMKspo65Z/J2+yRvEmqU1Kv Z1h91JHrnH1HCB/R8FxdwGoWUuDS9wX7uV6Q3XLiTFFBOy3yOZIu6HACZibIh8fkGRSo VtkpoZC5J6uGrEWT0kHCYATQ2bgNPSSXq8ToYnUJgaYo+4LaE+OoFiuDe6LiDevJ7ivQ jIik02hxmFuJLJPC8fXXIuvqkJWPoWVVaI4EvB+hcPITcwfwF36Xxy2rwyTTg3zqCZif M3kA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua+M8ss7imuJXV0Bogw9fU5gfLk8UNogKeA3DHDEpN4UeH+MRTa XkW4opxI9NyUfDgG7SAmKaIspYFBEfMM0njThUs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjsC6EXYlE5GmPZ4cHorgIglv7peKg70tltLFRlUNMnXipnoVRB6R66Yu9R4xLAwziPHJaRnQ/4in6/miu0rc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3104:: with SMTP id b4mr5224618ots.250.1587374887535; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Laura Abbott , Sumit Semwal , Sakari Ailus , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Christophe Leroy , Linux-Arch , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390 , Peter Zijlstra , linuxppc-dev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI Development , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Linux MM , Linux IOMMU , bpf , Robin Murphy , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81D3C3815B for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A3920A8B for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:34:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 80A3920A8B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495M3S2QQ8zDqnf for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:34:28 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.210.66; helo=mail-ot1-f66.google.com; envelope-from=geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com (mail-ot1-f66.google.com [209.85.210.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495LwC2QHJzDqtV for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:28:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id m13so7476417otf.6 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XArWxGkJ+VyTPp7Wsn4dbWWlVRq/sh+tie0xFdY8Wzs=; b=kTm0kKyKYgk+E/89ApT8cz5JOrHSUHV0hyXaPdcQQrYdEvOzoWAENTLqSypWmG8z+1 aCNsSmcu428K/pUSDVUXwcG+DwIdsBgsozDn2lobzfneqXg8iKmi3x6lMvdtVb10X+w+ XPGaDhWSjumoYyoCLc57ej086vaVNa2WkzMOmGVPbcoOwKXCJDMNPeiMKh9bk+YxRKer myLAoRD9cZDo78LlTc+nZX3G+2DUSc7idSHjlpEEBiHRQhuuh9W03u0PQZJjYe5JXBc7 o0IzWZ4XbXgw85GVIia751kFHq8LN14TlSh18qDUARKg+DjwtPVHwVlcBgkm5MoDyJ4Y 08dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuarsuThoTud8i9YRXOLnsUyN+eVoFrGVSk4ewqEwKKEh5Gj8px/ C8ahAKqQAa59Mma36mFyDsKJHYpZ1wBA9k4cVjA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjsC6EXYlE5GmPZ4cHorgIglv7peKg70tltLFRlUNMnXipnoVRB6R66Yu9R4xLAwziPHJaRnQ/4in6/miu0rc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3104:: with SMTP id b4mr5224618ots.250.1587374887535; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller To: Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , DRI Development , Linux MM , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Sumit Semwal , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , Wei Liu , Stephen Hemminger , the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra , Laura Abbott , Nitin Gupta , Daniel Vetter , Haiyang Zhang , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, bpf , Linux ARM , Robin Murphy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Linux IOMMU , Sakari Ailus , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65992C54FCC for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF8A20CC7 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3EF8A20CC7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1730C869C7; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BAIbxMKx9I5G; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF59A869BF; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFF1C07FF; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0569BC0177 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85AB85BD1 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wVLP_cBcSCEf for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com (mail-ot1-f67.google.com [209.85.210.67]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591A385BB5 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j4so7465280otr.11 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XArWxGkJ+VyTPp7Wsn4dbWWlVRq/sh+tie0xFdY8Wzs=; b=o/oZalWKdLxJQiYukI1EsVxZJn6D/4f4qh1Xio1gj7fQTZ5qhWR0DVA98yR3sy4Rwh Kz6984yEqh/dSlTe+nwnZoAWicZCPh7DkIPWEW3zIzoNqPiA1Mj7qHiC+JT/yKv5fcqH 4HKiuKrBp/VecEfGGDubANZNol0V1Uy58PrKYSe/5/k0rcuTpFSXlicwn5Qnryn31F4g zc1zxLQXDW07mwjVTHhCc/LcZcZJayJwShONc3jHTYGJbFGHMOOzFCR6b5gDEW5rEnvf /ppdjgtQqO45OC/38dJLOPPyTOgpGCLjhZesV8jBQxoeWDMrAjmlMO7Br6QeoD+pyPAu hGbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua4pJ9TfHxNgXxmSZNLDk551YRCyl7q24epftbDM8rTBn6hCo3l okXUzC8pzp9m6L+qKvNUJc8VlD9eR2PRnMg/3xs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjsC6EXYlE5GmPZ4cHorgIglv7peKg70tltLFRlUNMnXipnoVRB6R66Yu9R4xLAwziPHJaRnQ/4in6/miu0rc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3104:: with SMTP id b4mr5224618ots.250.1587374887535; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , DRI Development , Linux MM , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Sumit Semwal , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , Wei Liu , Stephen Hemminger , the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra , Laura Abbott , Nitin Gupta , Daniel Vetter , Haiyang Zhang , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, bpf , Linux ARM , Christophe Leroy , Robin Murphy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Linux IOMMU , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6D8C3A5A0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6698120CC7 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="n3CpQNMn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6698120CC7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vX4PAG/XdyhNExuTxsKHav7NrgI4EyUIsfhjGUg7uZw=; b=n3CpQNMnL9jFuF QRluA7d7qwIIf70G/+JMKmghks+BsqrN6KVy9y9Vo4stZqlIahFFwZWwHVSvqESF/yM3F77QCTp/V jGFiIBGZCZ5zFfisVH1iSCCsGTPpASXOnhYvI6RNqZLWyLxBraHvokJWdX32imjGje0e/lkXMhS6X 3nVLuD6Q32AaEYVI7gndez6AZdbQmI/y60YpkmFiaDy2o6dWwkqvrfe1NgOgvD3qnQByFncCeJmbT WW8GhiR8r1X2zuWZ5yTw+gT1nTi7VO9YrtLu0sgTpWHERjGrHDXqHOkA5df8GBslxAP6DlIjrCMPS Y1+XkFJB+azLzEoWREaQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jQSit-0003U8-Cj; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:15 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com ([209.85.210.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jQSim-0003N8-IM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id i22so7464357otp.12 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XArWxGkJ+VyTPp7Wsn4dbWWlVRq/sh+tie0xFdY8Wzs=; b=G350pSsSPEAek7SU56H1c3shrUB69LqdYCKfc2qCRBY/j4BiB59FG2lGwONLvtu5iT q1adrLCrkIkQk1gfI3Jbv8hejrU5/WwDpDMc7D7sZtvoym9Bi8kwyDEAIV0+6jLY9rxo xqdWfOA1oNQ1NUVqru7VGFBwFZBKnRTp+K9DaFf6QehERpmkm1OPqfx28oTAyaw4wUFf cS+SoT1tkGK1PkpLrQdACB7GkqjV6syqaTNFYN1BJsD9VjPd1ztH7WdtyK3JK6JokBto yezhfXhSSurCML+TYnh7GeTwTK61UuswQF+JvzyUmFkPMYoTDZ8TUezOj2WPqljFcGGQ /kYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY5t6C2cfCs7EncF4yfmIQwXaUCSdYQAqmlc/n3wHQoaNzRgrRo KlFJ48vDzTZCKAxl0wSu2l9K6QGYKUmYY4R689k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjsC6EXYlE5GmPZ4cHorgIglv7peKg70tltLFRlUNMnXipnoVRB6R66Yu9R4xLAwziPHJaRnQ/4in6/miu0rc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3104:: with SMTP id b4mr5224618ots.250.1587374887535; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller To: Christoph Hellwig X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200420_022808_616719_A5BFD219 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.85 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , DRI Development , Linux MM , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Sumit Semwal , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , Wei Liu , Stephen Hemminger , the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra , Laura Abbott , Nitin Gupta , Daniel Vetter , Haiyang Zhang , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, bpf , Linux ARM , Christophe Leroy , Robin Murphy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Linux IOMMU , Sakari Ailus , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04FFC3815B for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9143420CC7 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9143420CC7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043196E48D; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com (mail-ot1-f65.google.com [209.85.210.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4876E48D for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j4so7465279otr.11 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XArWxGkJ+VyTPp7Wsn4dbWWlVRq/sh+tie0xFdY8Wzs=; b=YPqQakCXVzcYzLwibmXNajb03Nxx7msmXYOEJ3J4xQR84MvSzKC/MQjw/Qpu7OCKrd T0bFwWxi7YnjjTQa7RL9wOx+y+cAC0WxoDAP+cytOsaYhiT6yo2ZtGsTw4wcYhyGSR/I l+IEElovdpA5eSf0zvizAtCqkJu366N8atE5a5S1cTEOMe4o/uPJ3rBNKTBjEyllA6BH WpjUI8nV0MGOI67u4T93gU/EpELMd6S7RqkOorZcEwVr+LsTJ2u8JerxV0Khx/igI435 nDIOkBufNhPQSyUmONL/3Q2Bk2xzi25QsmXVTuZJEwdF5NhB2AKieV15TaPLmr9wlyVY gcpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaX4s3e6rBAsR/slMc0QT7DeRvcFBSpE2zWcA2TO/AwR09t0Yan SrMYe9QaTakJL3pp9FhMCwshv4r6q52KfwNFobE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKjsC6EXYlE5GmPZ4cHorgIglv7peKg70tltLFRlUNMnXipnoVRB6R66Yu9R4xLAwziPHJaRnQ/4in6/miu0rc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3104:: with SMTP id b4mr5224618ots.250.1587374887535; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414131348.444715-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200414131348.444715-25-hch@lst.de> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] mm: remove __vmalloc_node_flags_caller To: Christoph Hellwig X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , DRI Development , Linux MM , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , Wei Liu , Stephen Hemminger , the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra , Laura Abbott , Nitin Gupta , Haiyang Zhang , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, bpf , Linux ARM , Christophe Leroy , Robin Murphy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Minchan Kim , Linux IOMMU , Sakari Ailus , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just use __vmalloc_node instead which gets and extra argument. To be > able to to use __vmalloc_node in all caller make it available outside > of vmalloc and implement it in nommu.c. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) One more nommu failure below... > --- a/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/mm/nommu.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc); > > -void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags, > - void *caller) > +void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, gfp_t gfp_mask, > + int node, const void *caller) > { > return __vmalloc(size, flags); On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:39 AM wrote: > FAILED linux-next/m5272c3_defconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Apr 20, 18:38 > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14213623/ > > mm/nommu.c:164:25: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'class'? "return __vmalloc(size, gfp_mask);" Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel