From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C567C433EF for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53624 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhBju-0001y2-4l for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:55:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhBb4-0000aO-BC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:46:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:48230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhBb1-00012T-1m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:46:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1650465977; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wAqSy8p4YjY+ZmOBYXfmT1xiaq8drrFofwG+yavWeBs=; b=YQoPI0ct14kdkADWs7gB4K+pqg7Vf/xx0yHrtESTcywvGQEbX0TNHoRJO9UYF4y0p/5R1R kDUx90cFgxMtykzFtegCLngToIAaiqS94qmdBHpM6eKUZC3d3BbaCUkcts/Nf2UiGub7sL ihhgrdOHseFlftJ3O6hhv2NFPnyxZQg= Received: from mail-yb1-f197.google.com (mail-yb1-f197.google.com [209.85.219.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-512-xG2cOQuHMUySoXpKxX9ZMQ-1; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:46:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xG2cOQuHMUySoXpKxX9ZMQ-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f197.google.com with SMTP id q142-20020a252a94000000b00644b8a5aa4fso1646796ybq.13 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wAqSy8p4YjY+ZmOBYXfmT1xiaq8drrFofwG+yavWeBs=; b=o0XV/vvdEL0bweNQyyHZpHs/DQ/5x9fLkf7s9CmbKQUphMpUelOfCkKlb/WIwSXRq4 b3DzIdxgzJgjeeN27DvAUHyhDRV17o6n9wnPNNdPDla4ebOLpkMWD4Gk3Gpx54c2qQ2m B0nmHPm6rqi2BD7Ief+Vf3zbCeGruM1XT48GP28PEqsZVIYQrVpjqp4dpx89DsUzT53D UAA5k/sVaoZHHMHbmIG13naPYxdj10u0GxVae4FOtL+feD0kWOALXCS2C5jS/Wuw2Kzk m9BtKByW5hmjokU+WWfMjm6VvqfCEJU5hSQkzT+r2MpzxZlG8qUcgOFagvxQxV8hhVDp VHOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jowxc6XfTEPdRxDA4y4QZx4owPkfqK1rAkbVzyGCy7D+Nr6eZ hr+fUnDAb7hzvNblSt/DzS9rp8otv/92ZyVx9+3234je5lofdhRn/AlUZFxU2eql/Z/MH6En/ZB PufyMU+sWqEayPKYPuYNPWKi8M2rfvQg= X-Received: by 2002:a81:7b43:0:b0:2ec:8bb:3aef with SMTP id w64-20020a817b43000000b002ec08bb3aefmr21392435ywc.267.1650465975973; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypuRfSMzq4Vfn5dD4ZwYF4sJ/9Ten6KHbkS2FF8BLurWXpeKN4/RNaCmjZji7mAGDseh/osH+iV1B/70zQCig= X-Received: by 2002:a81:7b43:0:b0:2ec:8bb:3aef with SMTP id w64-20020a817b43000000b002ec08bb3aefmr21392415ywc.267.1650465975820; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220420132624.2439741-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20220420132624.2439741-18-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <840f08cb-e28c-6802-96c7-b1f82dd36427@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <840f08cb-e28c-6802-96c7-b1f82dd36427@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 18:46:05 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/41] doc/build-platforms: document supported compilers To: Thomas Huth Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=mlureau@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 6:37 PM Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 20/04/2022 16.10, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:26:00PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com w= rote: > >> From: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > >> > >> According to our configure checks, this is the list of supported > >> compilers. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > >> Reviewed-by: Damien Hedde > >> --- > >> docs/about/build-platforms.rst | 10 ++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/docs/about/build-platforms.rst b/docs/about/build-platfor= ms.rst > >> index c29a4b8fe649..1980c5d2476f 100644 > >> --- a/docs/about/build-platforms.rst > >> +++ b/docs/about/build-platforms.rst > >> @@ -92,6 +92,16 @@ hosted on Linux (Debian/Fedora). > >> The version of the Windows API that's currently targeted is Vista / = Server > >> 2008. > >> > >> +Supported compilers > >> +------------------- > >> + > >> +To compile, QEMU requires either: > >> + > >> +- GCC >=3D 7.4.0 > >> +- Clang >=3D 6.0 > >> +- XCode Clang >=3D 10.0 > > > > Do we need to spell out the versions explicitly ? These versions are > > all derived from what's available in the repos of the supported build > > platforms, similar to any other build deps we have. I don't think we > > want to start a precedent of duplicating versions in this doc for > > build deps we have, and there's nothing particularly special about > > compilers in this respect. > > I agree with Daniel - when I saw this patch, the first thought that I had > was: "This will be getting out of sync quickly" ... I don't have the impression we bump our compiler requirement regularly or lightly. > so I'd also recommend to rather not add this here. Outdated documentation is still better than no documentation. YMMV.