From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754118AbcK1Hl5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 02:41:57 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.161.171]:33924 "EHLO mail-yw0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751725AbcK1Hlr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 02:41:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161128072157.GA17504@kroah.com> References: <5788dd3650bed67a1551e209847ecdf732eb745b.1479986112.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> <20161128072157.GA17504@kroah.com> From: Baolin Wang Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:41:46 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: Remove unuseful 'return' and 'break' statement To: Greg KH Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, USB , LKML , Mark Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28 November 2016 at 15:21, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:29:25PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >> Hi Mathias, >> >> On 24 November 2016 at 19:16, Baolin Wang wrote: >> > Since these 'return' statements are not generally useful in void >> > function, remove them. Also remove one unuseful 'break' statement >> > in xhci_setup_addressable_virt_dev() function. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang >> > --- >> > Changes since v1: >> > - Add description of removing 'break' statement in commitlog. >> > --- >> >> Could you apply this patch if there are no other comments? Thanks. > > Less than a week response for a simple cleanup patch? Why the rush and > pressure? Relax, this really isn't an important patch... I am sorry for the pressure, I just thought it is one simple cleanup patch. It is okay for me to wait for. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards