All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clean up x86_32 stackprotector
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:10:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2j9h7FjpG_s_a09vKTCV+CYafjsKgK-k2RH7TG59FWz-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1601925251.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 3:30 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> x86_32 stackprotector is a maintenance nightmare.  Clean it up.  This
> disables stackprotector on x86_32 on GCC 8.1 and on all clang
> versions -- I'll file a bug for the latter.

This should be doable on 64-bit too.  All that would need to be done
is to remove the zero-base of the percpu segment (which would simplify
alot of other code).

--
Brian Gerst

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-05 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-05 19:30 [PATCH 0/2] Clean up x86_32 stackprotector Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/stackprotector/32: Make the canary into a regular percpu variable Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-06  2:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-06  4:51     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-06  8:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-06 17:14   ` Brian Gerst
2020-10-07  1:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-07  7:03   ` kernel test robot
2020-10-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/entry/32: Remove leftover macros after stackprotector cleanups Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-06  8:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-05 23:10 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2020-10-06  8:32   ` [PATCH 0/2] Clean up x86_32 stackprotector Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMzpN2j9h7FjpG_s_a09vKTCV+CYafjsKgK-k2RH7TG59FWz-w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.