All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS/TCP timeouts
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:36:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN-5tyHm+aG9GmM1EWFDLeKfLxJWvGSGbRP5QwN4=phwaNQkyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN-5tyFVb_jqt+jknn2+o6_Cu=7cKw4qt9B_e2pd0azu2-7zaQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Trond,

I'd like to raise this once again. Is this true that setting a timeout
limit (TCP_USER_TIMEOUT) is not user configurable (rather I'm pretty
sure it is not) but my question is why shouldn't it be tied to the
"timeo" mount option? Right now, only the sesson/lease manager thread
sets it via rpc_set_connect_timeout() to be lease period related.

Is it the fact that we don't want to allow user to control TCP
settings via the mount options? But somehow folks are expecting to be
able to set low "timeo" value and have the (dead) connection to be
considered dead earlier than for a rather long timeout period which is
happening now.

Thanks.

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:06 PM Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:45 PM Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 14:31 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Is it true that NFS mount option "timeo" has nothing to do with the
> > > socket's setting of the user-specified timeout TCP_USER_TIMEOUT.
> > > Instead, when creating a TCP socket NFS uses either default/hard
> > > coded
> > > value of 60s for v3 or for v4.x it's lease based. Is there no value
> > > is
> > > having an adjustable TCP timeout value?
> > >
> >
> > It is adjusted. Please see the calculation in
> > xs_tcp_set_socket_timeouts().
>
> but it's not user configurable, is it? I don't see a way to modify
> v3's default 60s TCP timeout. and also in v4, the timeouts are set
> from xs_tcp_set_connect_timeout() for the lease period but again not
> user configurable, as far as i can tell.
>
> >
> > --
> > Trond Myklebust
> > Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> > trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
> >
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-03 18:31 NFS/TCP timeouts Olga Kornievskaia
2018-10-03 18:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2018-10-03 19:06   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-12-11 20:36     ` Olga Kornievskaia [this message]
2019-12-12 16:47       ` Trond Myklebust
2019-12-12 18:13         ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-12-12 19:31           ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAN-5tyHm+aG9GmM1EWFDLeKfLxJWvGSGbRP5QwN4=phwaNQkyQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.