From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haojian Zhuang Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] i2c: pxa: use devm_kzalloc Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:16:59 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1350551224-12857-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> <1350551224-12857-5-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> <5080826D.6040108@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5080826D.6040108-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Stephen Warren Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/18/2012 03:06 AM, Haojian Zhuang wrote: >> Use devm_kzalloc & add checking in probe() function. > > This patch seems unrelated to this series. In fact, the series touches a > bunch of different subsystems; would you expect all these patches to be > merged through a single tree? If so, which? Yes, I expect all these patches could be merged by pinctrl subtree. Regards Haojian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:16:59 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] i2c: pxa: use devm_kzalloc In-Reply-To: <5080826D.6040108@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1350551224-12857-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> <1350551224-12857-5-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> <5080826D.6040108@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/18/2012 03:06 AM, Haojian Zhuang wrote: >> Use devm_kzalloc & add checking in probe() function. > > This patch seems unrelated to this series. In fact, the series touches a > bunch of different subsystems; would you expect all these patches to be > merged through a single tree? If so, which? Yes, I expect all these patches could be merged by pinctrl subtree. Regards Haojian