From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Etienne Carriere Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:00:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] test: dm: tee: extend with RPC test In-Reply-To: <20210120175530.92057-5-igor.opaniuk@gmail.com> References: <20210120175530.92057-1-igor.opaniuk@gmail.com> <20210120175530.92057-5-igor.opaniuk@gmail.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Igor, On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 18:56, Igor Opaniuk wrote: > > From: Igor Opaniuk > > Extend existing DM tee tests adding test coverage for reverse RPC calls. > Currently this commit only adds tests for I2C requests from TEE driver > to TEE supplicant, for instance reading/writing data to emulated i2c > eeprom defines in standard sandbox test device tree > (arch/sandbox/dts/test.dtb): > > => i2c bus > Bus 0: i2c at 0 (active 0) > 2c: eeprom at 2c, offset len 1, flags 0 > ... > > Running TEE tests: > => ut dm tee > Test: dm_test_tee: tee.c > Test: dm_test_tee: tee.c (flat tree) > Failures: 0 > > Signed-off-by: Igor Opaniuk > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass > > --- > > (no changes since v1) > > test/dm/tee.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/dm/tee.c b/test/dm/tee.c > index ddbdcfb0cf..51ffb4e4a9 100644 > --- a/test/dm/tee.c > +++ b/test/dm/tee.c > @@ -13,11 +13,12 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > -static int open_session(struct udevice *dev, u32 *session) > +static int open_session(struct udevice *dev, u32 *session, > + struct tee_optee_ta_uuid uuid) maybe pass a pointer to the uuid. or maybe not, uuid is only 16 bytes.... > { > struct tee_open_session_arg arg; > - const struct tee_optee_ta_uuid uuid = TA_AVB_UUID; > int rc; > > memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg)); > @@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ static int open_session(struct udevice *dev, u32 *session) > return 0; > } > > -static int invoke_func(struct udevice *dev, u32 session) > +static int invoke_func_avb(struct udevice *dev, u32 session) > { > struct tee_param param = { .attr = TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT }; > struct tee_invoke_arg arg; > @@ -47,6 +48,47 @@ static int invoke_func(struct udevice *dev, u32 session) > return 0; > } > > +static int invoke_func_rpc_test(struct udevice *dev, u32 session, > + u64 op, u64 busnum, u64 chip_addr, > + u8 *buf, size_t buf_size) > +{ > + struct tee_param param[2]; > + struct tee_invoke_arg arg; > + struct tee_shm *shm_buf; > + int rc; > + > + memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg)); > + arg.session = session; > + arg.func = op; > + > + rc = tee_shm_alloc(dev, buf_size, > + TEE_SHM_ALLOC, &shm_buf); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + if (op == TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_WRITE) > + memcpy(shm_buf->addr, buf, buf_size); > + > + memset(param, 0, sizeof(param)); > + param[0].attr = TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT; > + param[0].u.value.a = busnum; > + param[0].u.value.b = chip_addr; > + param[1].attr = TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT; > + param[1].u.memref.shm = shm_buf; > + param[1].u.memref.size = buf_size; > + > + if (tee_invoke_func(dev, &arg, 2, param) || arg.ret) { > + goto out; > + rc = -1; Looks like those lines shall be swapped! > + } > + > + if (op == TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_READ) > + memcpy(buf, shm_buf->addr, buf_size); > +out: > + tee_shm_free(shm_buf); > + return rc; > +} > + > static int match(struct tee_version_data *vers, const void *data) > { > return vers->gen_caps & TEE_GEN_CAP_GP; > @@ -62,6 +104,7 @@ static int test_tee(struct unit_test_state *uts, struct test_tee_vars *vars) > struct tee_version_data vers; > struct udevice *dev; > struct sandbox_tee_state *state; > + struct tee_optee_ta_uuid avb_uuid = TA_AVB_UUID; > u32 session = 0; > int rc; > u8 data[128]; > @@ -71,11 +114,11 @@ static int test_tee(struct unit_test_state *uts, struct test_tee_vars *vars) > state = dev_get_priv(dev); > ut_assert(!state->session); > > - rc = open_session(dev, &session); > + rc = open_session(dev, &session, avb_uuid); > ut_assert(!rc); > ut_assert(session == state->session); > > - rc = invoke_func(dev, session); > + rc = invoke_func_avb(dev, session); > ut_assert(!rc); > > rc = tee_close_session(dev, session); > @@ -103,11 +146,65 @@ static int test_tee(struct unit_test_state *uts, struct test_tee_vars *vars) > return 0; > } > > +#define I2C_BUF_SIZE 64 > + > +static int test_tee_rpc(struct unit_test_state *uts) > +{ > + struct tee_version_data vers; > + struct udevice *dev; > + struct sandbox_tee_state *state; > + struct tee_optee_ta_uuid rpc_test_uuid = TA_RPC_TEST_UUID; > + u32 session = 0; > + int rc; > + > + char *test_str = "Test string"; > + u8 data[I2C_BUF_SIZE] = {0}; > + u8 data_from_eeprom[I2C_BUF_SIZE] = {0}; > + > + /* Use sandbox I2C EEPROM emulation; bus: 0, chip: 0x2c */ > + u64 bus = 0; > + u64 chip = 0x2c; > + > + dev = tee_find_device(NULL, match, NULL, &vers); > + ut_assert(dev); > + state = dev_get_priv(dev); > + ut_assert(!state->session); > + > + /* Test RPC call asking for I2C sevice */ > + rc = open_session(dev, &session, rpc_test_uuid); > + ut_assert(!rc); > + ut_assert(session == state->session); > + > + /* Write buffer */ > + strncpy((char *)data, test_str, strlen(test_str)); > + rc = invoke_func_rpc_test(dev, session, TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_WRITE, > + bus, chip, data, sizeof(data)); > + ut_assert(!rc); > + > + /* Read buffer */ > + rc = invoke_func_rpc_test(dev, session, TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_READ, > + bus, chip, data_from_eeprom, > + sizeof(data_from_eeprom)); > + ut_assert(!rc); > + > + /* Compare */ > + ut_assert(!memcmp(data, data_from_eeprom, sizeof(data))); > + > + rc = tee_close_session(dev, session); > + ut_assert(!rc); > + ut_assert(!state->session); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int dm_test_tee(struct unit_test_state *uts) > { > struct test_tee_vars vars = { NULL, NULL }; > int rc = test_tee(uts, &vars); > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST)) > + rc = test_tee_rpc(uts); > + This scratches return code from test_tee(). Best regards, Etienne > /* In case test_tee() asserts these may still remain allocated */ > tee_shm_free(vars.reg_shm); > tee_shm_free(vars.alloc_shm); > -- > 2.25.1 >