On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Andrea Merello wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0200, Andrea Merello wrote:
> > > Introduce drm_simple_display_pipe_attach_bridge() in order Yes it's just going to be a one-line, but it'll do a typecast and so
> > > to make it possible to use drm encoders with the simple display
> > > pipes managed by simple_kms_helpers
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@tronnes.org>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> >
> > Threading of your patch series is somehow broken, usually that should all
> > work nicely if you've set up git send-email.
> >
> > One question: Should we ahve a drm_simple_display_pipe_detach_bridge (for
> > cleanup) too?
> >
>
> Unsure if it worths. May be nice to have a balanced pair, but it would
> probably end up in
> a quite redundant one-line func, that only calls drm_bridge_detach with the
> very same argument.
>
> ..But of course if you want I can add it in v2 series.
better encapsulate the internals of the simple pipe helper.
I think that's
worth it - we have piles&piles of functions and #defines just to make
little one-line bits of code a notch more readable.
And yes the symmetry is nice too ;-)
-Daniel