* ec pool history objects
@ 2015-06-15 10:06 池信泽
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: 池信泽 @ 2015-06-15 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
hi, all:
when I use ec poll, I see there are some object history for object xxxxxx.
Such as: xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_fe1_2,
xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_fe2_2
xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_ffffffffffffffff_2
I think this object is used for roll_back when not all shards have
written object to filestore. Is it right?
If that, why not delete this history objects when all shards has
written object to filestore?
--
Regards,
xinze
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* ec pool history objects
@ 2015-06-15 10:04 池信泽
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: 池信泽 @ 2015-06-15 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 443 bytes --]
hi, all:
when I use ec poll, I see there are some object history for object
xxxxxx.
Such as: xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_fe1_2, xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_fe2_2
xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_ffffffffffffffff_2
I think this object is used for roll_back when not all shards have
written object to filestore. Is it right?
If that, why not delete this history objects when all shards has
written object to filestore?
--
Regards,
xinze
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 764 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 178 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* ec pool history objects
@ 2015-06-15 10:02 池信泽
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: 池信泽 @ 2015-06-15 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]
hi, all:
when I use ec poll, I see there are some object history for object
xxxxxx.
[root@node3 2.1d6s2_head]# ll -R | grep xxxxxx
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Jun 15 17:41 xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_fe1_2
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Jun 15 17:41 xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_fe2_2
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Jun 15 17:45
xxxxxx__head_610951D6__2_ffffffffffffffff_2
I think this object is used for roll_back when not all shards have
written object to filestore. Is it right?
If that, why not delete this history objects when all shards has written
object to filestore?
--
Regards,
xinze
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 843 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 178 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-15 10:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-15 10:06 ec pool history objects 池信泽
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-15 10:04 池信泽
2015-06-15 10:02 池信泽
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.