From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1 ]mmc: Support-FFU-for-eMMC-v5.0 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:12:37 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]:58296 "EHLO mail-ob0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750941AbaB1CMi (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:12:38 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wo20so980494obc.8 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:12:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Shchislowski Cc: "cjb@laptop.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Grundler , Alex Lemberg Avi, thanks for posting this and apologies for not seeing/reviewing this earlier. Comments inline below. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Avi Shchislowski wrote: > Add Support to Field Firmware Update (FFU) for eMMC v5.0 and up devices. > > The code implemented according to JEDEC eMMC spec - JESD84-B50.pdf > http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/technology-focus-areas/flash-memory-ssds-ufs-emmc/e-mmc > > > Signed-off-by: Avi Shchislowski > Signed-off-by: Alex Lemberg > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/card/Kconfig index 5562308..19ba729 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/Kconfig > @@ -68,3 +68,11 @@ config MMC_TEST > > This driver is only of interest to those developing or > testing a host driver. Most people should say N here. > + > +config MMC_FFU > + bool "FFU SUPPORT" This should be spelled out: "eMMC 5.0+ Field Firmware update support" On second thought, I don't believe FFU should be an option. It should be part of the core support and required since it's part of the eMMC spec. > + depends on MMC != n > + help > + This is an option to run firmware update on eMMC 5.0. > + Field firmware updates (FFU) enables features enhancement > + in the field. Wordsmithing suggestion: eMMC 5.0 spec defines a standard method to update firmware on eMMC 5.0 compliant devices. Setting this option to Y enables support to update firmware on eMMC 5.0 compliant devices. See mmc-utils package for corresponding user space tool which invokes the FFU method enabled by this option. (It's the fact the mmc-utils depends on this feature that makes me think it should be required.) > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile index c73b406..1e9223b 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile > @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_TEST) += mmc_test.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SDIO_UART) += sdio_uart.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_FFU) += ffu.o > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c index 7b5424f..8311200 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > > @@ -525,6 +526,17 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev, > > mmc_get_card(card); > > + if (cmd.opcode == MMC_FFU_DOWNLOAD_OP) { > + err = mmc_ffu_download(card, &cmd , idata->buf, > + idata->buf_bytes); > + goto cmd_rel_host; > + } I saw the mmc_ffu_prepare_mrq() includes support to READ. While I don't believe "upload" is part of the spec, does SanDisk implement an "MMC_FFU_UPLOAD_OP"? > + > + if (cmd.opcode == MMC_FFU_INSTALL_OP) { > + err = mmc_ffu_install(card); Should the "install" be keeping track of state to make sure previous FFU_DOWNLOAD_OP to this device was successful? INSTALL_OP makes no sense if DOWNLOAD failed or had issues. If it should be stateless, then perhaps call this step "MMC_RESET_OP"? > + goto cmd_rel_host; > + } > + > err = mmc_blk_part_switch(card, md); > if (err) > goto cmd_rel_host; > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/ffu.c b/drivers/mmc/card/ffu.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed5f30a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/ffu.c > @@ -0,0 +1,605 @@ > +/* > + * * ffu.c > + * > + * Modified by SanDisk Corp., Copyright (c) 2013 SanDisk Corp. > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > +(at > + * your option) any later version. > + * > + * The original, unmodified version of this program - the mmc_test.c > + * Copyright 2007-2008 Pierre Ossman > + * The file - is obtained under the GPL v2.0 license that is available > +via > + * http://www.gnu.org/licenses/, > + * or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.php > +*/ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +/** This is intended to be used for DocString? I'm not seeing a need for it since it's not an API. > + * struct mmc_ffu_pages - pages allocated by 'alloc_pages()'. > + * @page: first page in the allocation > + * @order: order of the number of pages allocated */ struct white space mangle. > +mmc_ffu_pages { > + struct page *page; > + unsigned int order; > +}; > + > +/** "/**" -- are you sure it's useful to have docbook stuff pick these up? These feel like local/internal definitions and aren't really part of any API. I think "/*" would be suitable. but Chris or someone could say otherwise. > + * struct mmc_ffu_mem - allocated memory. > + * @arr: array of allocations > + * @cnt: number of allocations > + */ > +struct mmc_ffu_mem { > + struct mmc_ffu_pages *arr; > + unsigned int cnt; > +}; I'm not seeing where this struct as being that useful - it's mostly obfuscating the code. ie it could just be two fields in struct mmc_ffu_area. mmc_ffu_free_mem() can take two parameters. The only possible justification would it's use as return value for mmc_ffu_alloc_mem(). I would consider a different way of returning the page array and page array element count. > + > +struct mmc_ffu_area { > + unsigned long max_sz; > + unsigned int max_tfr; > + unsigned int max_segs; > + unsigned int max_seg_sz; > + unsigned int blocks; > + unsigned int sg_len; > + struct mmc_ffu_mem *mem; > + struct scatterlist *sg; To help keep pointers "naturally aligned", can you put the "struct *" fields at the top of the struct mmc_ffu_area? > +}; > + > +static void mmc_ffu_prepare_mrq(struct mmc_card *card, > + struct mmc_request *mrq, struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int sg_len, > + u32 arg, unsigned int blocks, unsigned int blksz, int write) { > + BUG_ON(!mrq || !mrq->cmd || !mrq->data || !mrq->stop); BUG_ON means you are willing to crash the system if any of these are not true. Are you sure that's what you want? > + > + if (blocks > 1) { > + mrq->cmd->opcode = write ? > + MMC_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK : MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK; > + } else { > + mrq->cmd->opcode = write ? MMC_WRITE_BLOCK : > + MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK; > + } > + > + mrq->cmd->arg = arg; > + if (!mmc_card_blockaddr(card)) > + mrq->cmd->arg <<= 9; Assumes 512 byte. I'd prefer you use "/= DATA_SECTOR_SIZE" or whatever it is. If it's a constant, the compiler will know it's a power of two and turn that into a bit shift operation. > + > + mrq->cmd->flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC; > + if (blocks == 1) { > + mrq->stop = NULL; > + } else { > + mrq->stop->opcode = MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION; > + mrq->stop->arg = 0; > + mrq->stop->flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC; > + } > + > + mrq->data->blksz = blksz; > + mrq->data->blocks = blocks; > + mrq->data->flags = write ? MMC_DATA_WRITE : MMC_DATA_READ; > + mrq->data->sg = sg; > + mrq->data->sg_len = sg_len; > + > + mmc_set_data_timeout(mrq->data, card); } > + > +/* > + * Checks that a normal transfer didn't have any errors */ static int > +mmc_ffu_check_result(struct mmc_request *mrq) { > + BUG_ON(!mrq || !mrq->cmd || !mrq->data); > + > + if (mrq->cmd->error != 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (mrq->data->error != 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (mrq->stop != NULL && mrq->stop->error != 0) > + return -1; I'd prefer to see "-E" to be consistent with the return values. I'm also not sure all of these should be -EINVAL. > + > + if (mrq->data->bytes_xfered != (mrq->data->blocks * mrq->data->blksz)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int mmc_ffu_busy(struct mmc_command *cmd) { > + return !(cmd->resp[0] & R1_READY_FOR_DATA) || > + (R1_CURRENT_STATE(cmd->resp[0]) == R1_STATE_PRG); } > + > +static int mmc_ffu_wait_busy(struct mmc_card *card) { > + int ret, busy = 0; > + struct mmc_command cmd = {0}; > + > + memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command)); > + cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_STATUS; > + cmd.arg = card->rca << 16; > + cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R2 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC; > + > + do { > + ret = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0); Is it safe to re-use the cmd struct again without memsetting it? > + if (ret) > + break; > + > + if (!busy && mmc_ffu_busy(&cmd)) { > + busy = 1; > + if (card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY) { > + pr_warn("%s: Warning: Host did not " > + "wait for busy state to end.\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host)); > + } > + } > + > + } while (mmc_ffu_busy(&cmd)); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * transfer with certain parameters > + */ > +static int mmc_ffu_simple_transfer(struct mmc_card *card, > + struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int sg_len, u32 arg, > + unsigned int blocks, unsigned int blksz, int write) { > + struct mmc_request mrq = {0}; > + struct mmc_command cmd = {0}; > + struct mmc_command stop = {0}; > + struct mmc_data data = {0}; > + > + mrq.cmd = &cmd; > + mrq.data = &data; > + mrq.stop = &stop; The BUG_ON I questioned earlier is just checking this? I'm not seeing the point of having a BUG_ON above. > + mmc_ffu_prepare_mrq(card, &mrq, sg, sg_len, arg, blocks, blksz, > + write); > + mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq); > + > + mmc_ffu_wait_busy(card); > + > + return mmc_ffu_check_result(&mrq); } white space mangle. > + > +/* > + * Map memory into a scatterlist. > + */ > +static int mmc_ffu_map_sg(struct mmc_ffu_mem *mem, unsigned long size, > + struct scatterlist *sglist, unsigned int max_segs, > + unsigned int max_seg_sz, unsigned int *sg_len, > + int min_sg_len) > +{ > + struct scatterlist *sg = NULL; > + unsigned int i; > + unsigned long sz = size; > + > + sg_init_table(sglist, max_segs); > + if (min_sg_len > max_segs) > + min_sg_len = max_segs; > + > + *sg_len = 0; and add > + do { > + for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) { > + unsigned long len = PAGE_SIZE << > + mem->arr[i].order; This word wrap is likely wrong in the source code (not mangled by the mail handler). > + > + if (min_sg_len && (size / min_sg_len < len)) > + len = ALIGN(size / min_sg_len, CARD_BLOCK_SIZE); > + if (len > sz) > + len = sz; > + if (len > max_seg_sz) > + len = max_seg_sz; > + if (sg) > + sg = sg_next(sg); > + else > + sg = sglist; can't we initialize "sg" outside the loop to sglist? > + if (!sg) > + return -EINVAL; This test is for "sg = sg_next(sg)" code...both should move to the end of the loop. > + sg_set_page(sg, mem->arr[i].page, len, 0); This should be at the top of the loop? > + sz -= len; > + *sg_len += 1; > + if (!sz) > + break; move this test into the for() loop condition It's a bit confusing...why do{ } while (sz)? A comment explaining the relationship between sz and mem->cnt could justify the do/while loop. > + } > + } while (sz); > + > + if (sg) We will have returned -EINVAL if this is not true. We shouldn't need to test here. > + sg_mark_end(sg); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void mmc_ffu_free_mem(struct mmc_ffu_mem *mem) { > + if (!mem) > + return; > + while (mem->cnt--) > + __free_pages(mem->arr[mem->cnt].page, mem->arr[mem->cnt].order); > + kfree(mem->arr); > +} > + > +/* > + * Cleanup struct mmc_ffu_area. > + */ > +static int mmc_ffu_area_cleanup(struct mmc_ffu_area *area) { > + kfree(area->sg); > + mmc_ffu_free_mem(area->mem); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * Allocate a lot of memory, preferably max_sz but at least min_sz. In > +case > + * there isn't much memory do not exceed 1/16th total low mem pages. > +Also do > + * not exceed a maximum number of segments and try not to make segments > +much > + * bigger than maximum segment size. The comment doesn't explain WHY the code needs to do all the memory allocation gymnastics. It lists several the constraints, most of which are obvious from the code, but only explains one (why 1/16th total low mem pages). This feels like a lot of code to do what copy_from_user() and DMA API should be taking care of. (just guessing at this point though). > + */ > +static struct mmc_ffu_mem *mmc_ffu_alloc_mem(unsigned long min_sz, > + unsigned long max_sz, unsigned int max_segs, unsigned int > +max_seg_sz) { > + unsigned long max_page_cnt = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_sz, PAGE_SIZE); > + unsigned long min_page_cnt = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_sz, PAGE_SIZE); > + unsigned long max_seg_page_cnt = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_seg_sz, PAGE_SIZE); > + unsigned long page_cnt = 0; > + unsigned long limit = nr_free_buffer_pages() >> 4; > + struct mmc_ffu_mem *mem; > + > + if (max_page_cnt > limit) > + max_page_cnt = limit; > + if (min_page_cnt > max_page_cnt) > + min_page_cnt = max_page_cnt; > + > + if (max_seg_page_cnt > max_page_cnt) > + max_seg_page_cnt = max_page_cnt; > + > + if (max_segs > max_page_cnt) > + max_segs = max_page_cnt; > + > + mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_ffu_mem), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mem) > + return NULL; > + > + mem->arr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_ffu_pages) * max_segs, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mem->arr) > + goto out_free; > + > + while (max_page_cnt) { > + struct page *page; > + unsigned int order; > + gfp_t flags = GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA | __GFP_NOWARN | > + __GFP_NORETRY; > + > + order = get_order(max_seg_page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT); > + while (1) { > + page = alloc_pages(flags, order); > + if (page || !order) > + break; > + order -= 1; > + } Would this be cleaner to write as: do { page = alloc_pages(flags, order); while (!page && order--); "Nice" side effects: order will still have the same value if the allocation succeeds. > + if (!page) { > + if (page_cnt < min_page_cnt) > + goto out_free; > + break; > + } > + mem->arr[mem->cnt].page = page; > + mem->arr[mem->cnt].order = order; > + mem->cnt += 1; These three lines make sense - just recording what was allocated. > + if (max_page_cnt <= (1UL << order)) > + break; > + max_page_cnt -= 1UL << order; > + page_cnt += 1UL << order; > + if (mem->cnt >= max_segs) { Make this part of the while() loop condition. > + if (page_cnt < min_page_cnt) > + goto out_free; move this test out of the loop. > + break; > + } > + } > + > + return mem; if (page_cnt >= min_page_cnt) return mem; > + > +out_free: > + mmc_ffu_free_mem(mem); > + return NULL; > +} > + > +/* > + * Initialize an area for data transfers. > + * Copy the data to the allocated pages. > + */ > +static int mmc_ffu_area_init(struct mmc_ffu_area *area, struct mmc_card *card, > + u8 *data, unsigned int size) > +{ > + int ret, i, length; > + > + area->max_segs = card->host->max_segs; > + area->max_seg_sz = card->host->max_seg_size & ~(CARD_BLOCK_SIZE - 1); > + area->max_tfr = size; > + > + if (area->max_tfr >> 9 > card->host->max_blk_count) > + area->max_tfr = card->host->max_blk_count << 9; > + if (area->max_tfr > card->host->max_req_size) > + area->max_tfr = card->host->max_req_size; > + if (area->max_tfr / area->max_seg_sz > area->max_segs) > + area->max_tfr = area->max_segs * area->max_seg_sz; > + > + /* > + * Try to allocate enough memory for a max. sized transfer. Less is OK > + * because the same memory can be mapped into the scatterlist more than > + * once. Also, take into account the limits imposed on scatterlist > + * segments by the host driver. > + */ > + area->mem = mmc_ffu_alloc_mem(1, area->max_tfr, area->max_segs, > + area->max_seg_sz); > + if (!area->mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* copy data to page */ > + length = 0; > + for (i = 0; i < area->mem->cnt; i++) { > + memcpy(page_address(area->mem->arr[i].page), data + length, > + min(size - length, area->max_seg_sz)); > + length += area->max_seg_sz; > + } > + > + area->sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * area->max_segs, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!area->sg) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_free; > + } > + > + ret = mmc_ffu_map_sg(area->mem, size, area->sg, > + area->max_segs, area->max_seg_sz, &area->sg_len, > + 1); > + > + if (ret != 0) > + goto out_free; > + > + return 0; > + > +out_free: > + mmc_ffu_area_cleanup(area); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int mmc_ffu_write(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *src, u32 arg, > + int size) > +{ > + int rc; > + struct mmc_ffu_area mem; > + > + mem.sg = NULL; > + mem.mem = NULL; > + > + if (!src) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: data buffer is NULL\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host)); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + rc = mmc_ffu_area_init(&mem, card, src, size); > + if (rc != 0) > + goto exit; > + > + rc = mmc_ffu_simple_transfer(card, mem.sg, mem.sg_len, arg, > + size / CARD_BLOCK_SIZE, CARD_BLOCK_SIZE, 1); > + > +exit: > + mmc_ffu_area_cleanup(&mem); > + return rc; > +} > +/* Flush all scheduled work from the MMC work queue. > + * and initialize the MMC device */ > +static int mmc_ffu_restart(struct mmc_card *card) { > + struct mmc_host *host = card->host; > + int err = 0; > + > + mmc_cache_ctrl(host, 0); > + err = mmc_power_save_host(host); > + if (err) { > + pr_warn("%s: going to sleep failed (%d)!!!\n", > + __func__ , err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + err = mmc_power_restore_host(host); > + > +exit: > + > + return err; > +} > + > +/* Host set the EXT_CSD */ > +static int mmc_host_set_ffu(struct mmc_card *card, u32 ffu_enable) { > + int err; > + > + /* check if card is eMMC 5.0 or higher */ > + if (card->ext_csd.rev < 7) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (FFU_ENABLED(ffu_enable)) { > + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, > + EXT_CSD_FW_CONFIG, MMC_FFU_ENABLE, > + card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("%s: switch to FFU failed with error %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + return err; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int mmc_ffu_download(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_command *cmd, > + u8 *data, int buf_bytes) > +{ > + u8 ext_csd[CARD_BLOCK_SIZE]; > + int err; > + int ret; > + > + /* Read the EXT_CSD */ > + err = mmc_send_ext_csd(card, ext_csd); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d sending ext_csd\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Check if FFU is supported by card */ > + if (!FFU_SUPPORTED_MODE(ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SUPPORTED_MODE])) { > + err = -EINVAL; > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU is not supported\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + err = mmc_host_set_ffu(card, ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FW_CONFIG]); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU is not supported\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + err = -EINVAL; > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* set device to FFU mode */ > + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, EXT_CSD_MODE_CONFIG, > + MMC_FFU_MODE_SET, card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU is not supported\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit_normal; > + } > + > + /* set CMD ARG */ > + cmd->arg = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FFU_ARG] | > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FFU_ARG + 1] << 8 | > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FFU_ARG + 2] << 16 | > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FFU_ARG + 3] << 24; > + > + err = mmc_ffu_write(card, data, cmd->arg, buf_bytes); > + > +exit_normal: > + /* host switch back to work in normal MMC Read/Write commands */ > + ret = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, > + EXT_CSD_MODE_CONFIG, MMC_FFU_MODE_NORMAL, > + card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time); > + if (ret) > + err = ret; > + > +exit: > + return err; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_ffu_download); If FFU is not a config option and thus separate module, card/ffu.o can be directly linked with card/block.o to produce block.ko and we wouldn't need to export this symbol. BTW, Since this code is GPL, I'd consider using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). > + > +int mmc_ffu_install(struct mmc_card *card) { > + u8 ext_csd[CARD_BLOCK_SIZE]; > + int err; > + u32 ffu_data_len; > + u32 timeout; > + > + err = mmc_send_ext_csd(card, ext_csd); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d sending ext_csd\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Check if FFU is supported */ > + if (!FFU_SUPPORTED_MODE(ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SUPPORTED_MODE]) || > + FFU_CONFIG(ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FW_CONFIG])) { > + err = -EINVAL; > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU is not supported\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + ffu_data_len = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_NUM_OF_FW_SEC_PROG]| > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_NUM_OF_FW_SEC_PROG + 1] << 8 | > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_NUM_OF_FW_SEC_PROG + 2] << 16 | > + ext_csd[EXT_CSD_NUM_OF_FW_SEC_PROG + 3] << 24; > + > + if (!ffu_data_len) { > + err = -EPERM; > + return err; > + } > + > + /* check mode operation */ > + if (!FFU_FEATURES(ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FFU_FEATURES])) { > + /* restart the eMMC */ > + err = mmc_ffu_restart(card); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU install:\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + } > + } else { > + /* set device to FFU mode */ > + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, > + EXT_CSD_MODE_CONFIG, 0x1, > + card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU is not supported\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + timeout = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_OPERATION_CODE_TIMEOUT]; > + if (timeout == 0 || timeout > 0x17) { > + timeout = 0x17; > + pr_warn("FFU: %s: operation code timeout is out " > + "of range. Using maximum timeout.\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host)); > + } > + > + /* timeout is at millisecond resolution */ > + timeout = (100 * (1 << timeout) / 1000) + 1; > + > + /* set ext_csd to install mode */ > + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, > + EXT_CSD_MODE_OPERATION_CODES, > + MMC_FFU_INSTALL_SET, timeout); > + > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d setting install mode\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* read ext_csd */ > + err = mmc_send_ext_csd(card, ext_csd); > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d sending ext_csd\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + goto exit; > + } > + /* return status */ > + err = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FFU_STATUS]; > + if (err) { > + pr_err("FFU: %s: error %d FFU install:\n", > + mmc_hostname(card->host), err); > + err = -EINVAL; > + goto exit; > + } > + } > + > +exit: > + return err; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_ffu_install); Same story as the export for mmc_ffu_download. > + > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/ffu.h b/include/linux/mmc/ffu.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..744696c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/ffu.h > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ > +/* > + * > + * ffu.h > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2013 SanDisk Corp. > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > +(at > + * your option) any later version. > + * > + * This program was created by SanDisk Corp > + * The swrm_mmc_api.h file is obtained under the GPL v2.0 license that > +is > + * available via http://www.gnu.org/licenses/, > + * or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.php > +*/ > + > +#if !defined(_FFU_H_) > +#define _FFU_H_ > + > +#include > + > +#define CARD_BLOCK_SIZE 512 I thought sector size is advertised by the device. It could be either 512 or 4K bytes. No? "7.4.17 NUMBER_OF_FW_SECTORS_CORRECTLY_PROGRAMMED [305-302] The value is in terms of 512 Bytes or in multiple of eight 512Bytes sectors (4KBytes) depending on the value of the DATA_SECTOR_SIZE field." > + > +/* > + * eMMC5.0 Field Firmware Update (FFU) opcodes */ #define > +MMC_FFU_DOWNLOAD_OP 302 #define MMC_FFU_INSTALL_OP 303 White space mangle? > + > +#define MMC_FFU_MODE_SET 0x1 > +#define MMC_FFU_MODE_NORMAL 0x0 > +#define MMC_FFU_INSTALL_SET 0x1 > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_FFU > +#define MMC_FFU_ENABLE 0x0 > +#define MMC_FFU_CONFIG 0x1 This is redundant with CONFIG_MMC_FFU > +#define MMC_FFU_SUPPORTED_MODES 0x1 > +#define MMC_FFU_FEATURES 0x1 > + > +#define FFU_ENABLED(ffu_enable) (ffu_enable & MMC_FFU_CONFIG) Using "& MMC_FFU_CONFIG" inside "ifdef CONFIG_MMC_FFU" just looks wrong. Perhaps you want MMC_FFU_ENABLE 0x1 and then "& MMC_FFU_ENABLE"? Ah...this ends up looking at ext_csd[FW_CONFIG] & Update_Disable bit. Any reason to not match the names used in jedec spec? So I'd propose: #define FFU_DISABLED(fw_config) (fw_config & 0x1) and then use that as appropriate. > +#define FFU_SUPPORTED_MODE(ffu_sup_mode) \ > + (ffu_sup_mode && MMC_FFU_SUPPORTED_MODES) #define > +FFU_CONFIG(ffu_config) (ffu_config & MMC_FFU_CONFIG) #define > +FFU_FEATURES(ffu_fetures) (ffu_fetures & MMC_FFU_FEATURES) more white space mangle. I'm not sure what the point of "ffu_config" is. I'd drop it. BTW, typo: "fetures" should be features. > + > +int mmc_ffu_download(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_command *cmd, > + u8 *data, int buf_bytes); > +int mmc_ffu_install(struct mmc_card *card); #else static inline int more white space mangle. Is it gmail messing this up or did you send this through an exchange server? > +mmc_ffu_download(struct mmc_card *card, > + struct mmc_command *cmd, u8 *data, int buf_bytes) { > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > +static inline int mmc_ffu_install(struct mmc_card *card) { > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > + > +#endif > +#endif /* FFU_H_ */ > + > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h index 50bcde3..bf29e52 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h > @@ -272,6 +272,9 @@ struct _mmc_csd { > * EXT_CSD fields > */ > > +#define EXT_CSD_FFU_STATUS 26 /* R */ > +#define EXT_CSD_MODE_OPERATION_CODES 29 /* W */ > +#define EXT_CSD_MODE_CONFIG 30 /* R/W */ > #define EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE 32 /* W */ > #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_CTRL 33 /* R/W */ > #define EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION 34 /* R/W */ > @@ -290,6 +293,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd { > #define EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START 165 /* W */ > #define EXT_CSD_WR_REL_PARAM 166 /* RO */ > #define EXT_CSD_RPMB_MULT 168 /* RO */ > +#define EXT_CSD_FW_CONFIG 169 /* R/W */ > #define EXT_CSD_BOOT_WP 173 /* R/W */ > #define EXT_CSD_ERASE_GROUP_DEF 175 /* R/W */ > #define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG 179 /* R/W */ > @@ -325,6 +329,11 @@ struct _mmc_csd { > #define EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_LONG_TIME 247 /* RO */ > #define EXT_CSD_GENERIC_CMD6_TIME 248 /* RO */ > #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE 249 /* RO, 4 bytes */ > +#define EXT_CSD_NUM_OF_FW_SEC_PROG 302 /* RO */ > +#define EXT_CSD_FFU_ARG 487 /* RO, 4 bytes */ > +#define EXT_CSD_OPERATION_CODE_TIMEOUT 491 /* RO */ > +#define EXT_CSD_FFU_FEATURES 492 /* RO */ > +#define EXT_CSD_SUPPORTED_MODE 493 /* RO */ > #define EXT_CSD_TAG_UNIT_SIZE 498 /* RO */ > #define EXT_CSD_DATA_TAG_SUPPORT 499 /* RO */ > #define EXT_CSD_MAX_PACKED_WRITES 500 /* RO */ > -- > 1.7.5.4 > >