From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFAEC43441 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 06:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655322086C for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 06:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mAeeqN5+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 655322086C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727748AbeKIPwf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:52:35 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]:34007 "EHLO mail-vs1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727087AbeKIPwe (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:52:34 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y27so432327vsi.1 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 22:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g/cBHalX9FfHUH6C469tp34FRGr6iMtcAwSCSexw+Yo=; b=mAeeqN5+I5DZV1UGc+IkwHcUzv+4s0lEghIctWBJIO8K8jwB2aZcWGBJd7xa6ox7Wf o6/rikLDBROW/5qUhO/0RBF7+4moh717jYty9er0Yj7ozcW46KQwSoYgTXVzYp9IyXD/ HVkdPQ6eDFRgUfyqDMxHEPG3n7PkaoTJ8/tBC2BnmNRFWpnHJWFe13QMXx1bdCh6S6Io fYHuUJtQhzgvJ0Q2AXGiEq4RStvVZQnafqONcOlOpOL1qPX6E4v6aKadKW1Pm4Z/UotO eKy+nkwUaXRVTDP9iUBfYO0VZRf36hnCJO4JMcJAVKx+ipB8OjIalwvyV/9gZR3vL7Wa 6L2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g/cBHalX9FfHUH6C469tp34FRGr6iMtcAwSCSexw+Yo=; b=Imk3yMsBGjcda6S2pyXb4s0GG3w51L4S8eyA+/q6W8LYNnLrq3fI2DVxa8xlpQ5P0B 9snBTDAqliEOFaYXmOu8/UJgK/2bZ2uJ/57aFsPI1BCkLKLqsGlN7voV30Wv7J9fJUP3 NfxgUGrmAGnt4VdEVy9LJPRSolREPxeyEt/YwTAenTMEygMLlZwcyhHr8AomG7Xk/SYe aSYA02n4nZtnMn9zeHL4G4uBgrM88lmbVd23SqbwN+UL+RS52D0wD35zPDNKtf+QAJ3O wl0R615yxu80pfxLaBjUpyJ+5xDKqPPC8jXeMU9/85tVft7sSnTCpwWmF4K2GOGqa24x 4JgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKHNteSMbrgsn/uXf08aPYGzQoWyE6zpymyVGSrVKe8OnVMAIPf pe4scvuc6OIUxRr9jCTsKiMS/Qwetr18BVWlQus= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cpgJpaKtWqVKxt7K+pM7AAq64A/UZg4q2smM4+lHssErb5N1ZvnNED5n3bVxlpEGt142nrxI8vNEiaF5KLaVM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2f81:: with SMTP id v123mr3278038vsv.12.1541744011947; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 22:13:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181018083547.23262-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: From: Siva Rebbagondla Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:48:09 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow hardware scan to fall back to software To: Johannes Berg Cc: Linux Wireless , sushant kumar mishra , Siva Rebbagondla , Sanjay Kumar Konduri , Prameela Rani Garnepudi , Sushant Mishra , johannes.berg@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi, Gentle Remainder..!!!. Any update required for this patch?. If not, When can i expect this patch to be available in wireless-next?. Thank you, Siva Rebbagondla On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:21 PM Siva Rebbagondla wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 2:06 PM Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > From: Johannes Berg > > > > In some cases, like in the rsi driver hardware scan offload, there > > may be scenarios in which hardware scan might not be available or > > desirable. > > > > Allow drivers to cope with this by letting them fall back to software > > scan by returning the special value 1 from the hardware scan method. > > > Acked-and-Tested-by: Siva Rebbagondla