From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753536AbcARCZr (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:25:47 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:35392 "EHLO mail-vk0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753510AbcARCZg (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:25:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115152055.GA2917@e104805> References: <1450529677-23426-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> <20151221031940.GB5532@ubuntu> <20160105191925.GD3163@e104805> <20160115152055.GA2917@e104805> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:25:35 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: cpu_cooling: fix out of bounds access in time_in_idle From: Nicolas Boichat To: Javi Merino Cc: Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Daniel Kachhap , Viresh Kumar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Javi Merino wrote: > Eduardo, Rui, > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 07:19:25PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:49:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> > On 19-12-15, 12:54, Javi Merino wrote: >> > > In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we allocate the arrays for time_in_idle >> > > and time_in_idle_timestamp to be as big as the number of cpus in this >> > > cpufreq device. However, in get_load() we access this array using the >> > > cpu number as index, which can result in an out of bound access. >> > > >> > > Index time_in_idle{,_timestamp} using the index in the cpufreq_device's >> > > allowed_cpus mask, as we do for the load_cpu array in >> > > cpufreq_get_requested_power() >> > > >> > > Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat >> > > Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap >> > > Cc: Viresh Kumar >> > > Cc: Zhang Rui >> > > Cc: Eduardo Valentin >> > > Signed-off-by: Javi Merino >> > > --- >> > > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 14 ++++++++------ >> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > >> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar >> >> If there are no more objections, can you pick this up? > > Another gentle ping, can this be merged? Tested-by: Nicolas Boichat