From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7B2C43334 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com (mail-lf1-f53.google.com [209.85.167.53]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.3992.1657190409802182920 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 03:40:10 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ABBBIxLM; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.167.53, mailfrom: alex.kanavin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id t25so30364747lfg.7 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 03:40:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9b0j3F3BmMJQjnCHx/nzbGYISeZWiUbATxa1i2tPLgo=; b=ABBBIxLMMNvdUXDDuod5ZTzBtVnPMF/UJMMtvatmpywSeXexmr5O/zpx+znp/jTgKK CKtaSbduH6dvZpHVTkuJsGxasv8cNXQ4MGfv2d2NChRs4lP5dgfofR3ZTsyMSDAtGU4r Qfq12GaRaL7pVLo/o7KRfv0QzBqben/34w3RK5AjN5wjWkGOaZjaw7VT2oSta2gNR3Zs 0XuQ40x7Ai6aj8eUKGFdHYcRKNSsOgbLjrIWsa3AOwtkcINzV2MYogWBvsGVbg74dY/u vsdhpYJ5KBPnozlyeYhFHj27J4LHpsAvZvo5t5BSCBdZcX9pi3+ZA8foDyyKjLiU12Q8 dSDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9b0j3F3BmMJQjnCHx/nzbGYISeZWiUbATxa1i2tPLgo=; b=V+jmMvAU9cw3/z4cb1IE21PESlv1dNevhLHJZnR0qFxAkhrKY7tCRZngAx1+KyuIO6 FgJpsO+98wkyGHhk3xR3LdlJxj6/wIpQ+Qv+FIHeL+VgcfZIBOAIgEBBe2R1ZS68Ld06 4yo8kPxwLaaddA5z/SMIJjZw56lyvWaR+kCueL0s1H3eqPkzvWeWuaHMpLRw5axdE7iS CDVG0hQ1RK5I84WniAdbzUkCnW8errT4gnf7b0xcJaBo0qKuS0QfGwCPPEsBS/g3dxHF 0YyZzONBC57FWQEdJkvkHVMn+ZYiMgySXy5sK5Ld+1d2T79yPN1f0HyTOPlMSY1uBrXU gbSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+CFKlkX47UnnURjLPQN3sOnulpk/qQ1uzdttixpvrmr1XDoxui XXjZ/i6EDL0bZ7kssg3POsinRH/jruN+mVA3kDE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uI7wxYcWhHzsJdZrrm1naYRZN0sEbLzPUyVumlMmXBsR3QBLWH0+4WlPOKvGkNNZAJTZbSqYsUtn8O2EmhLjg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:13a4:b0:479:3b9f:f13c with SMTP id p36-20020a05651213a400b004793b9ff13cmr29327479lfa.380.1657190407732; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 03:40:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220706195311.974830-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com> <639E7961-BBE7-42D1-952E-FFCABEFB2655@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <639E7961-BBE7-42D1-952E-FFCABEFB2655@arm.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:39:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core][RFC] Layer Setup JSON schema and example To: Ross Burton Cc: "JPEWhacker@gmail.com" , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:40:14 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/167769 On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 12:36, Ross Burton wrote: > > Wait, how is YAML more readable, if JSON is valid YAML? > > But YAML is not valid JSON, and YAML is the one which can be readable, unlike JSON. YAML is also not an included python battery, while JSON is. I'll stick with JSON for now, if you provide specific examples of how the JSON that we're defining would look more readable rendered in YAML, that would be appreciated. Alex