Discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/git2-rs/pull/759 doesn't exactly
fill one with confidence, but still, can this be handled and fixed in rust
upstream? Non-upstreamable patches for what is a common use case aren't a
good idea.

Alex

On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 10:19, S. Lockwood-Childs <sjl@vctlabs.com> wrote:

> Typical error when trying to build a rust app (for example, librsvg)
> for aarch64 targets looks like:
>   undefined references to `__aarch64_ldadd8_rel'
>
> The upstream rust commit
> "add target feature outline-atomics"
> 0f9f241aac21bc77fb9e757da18207abefdc841d
> has caused a number of such link failure regressions on platforms with
> aarch64
> toolchains that are not able to cope with -moutline-atomics flag. This
> includes
> musl toolchains [1] but some glibc toolchains also are not able to handle
> this
> flag [2,3]
>
> OE gcc-cross-aarch64 is currently one of the latter, but when it *is* able
> to
> handle outline-atomics this patch should go away, to take advantage of the
> reported performance benefit.
>
> [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/git2-rs/issues/706
> [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org/msg661738.html
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830472
>
> Signed-off-by: S. Lockwood-Childs <sjl@vctlabs.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-target.inc    |  2 +
>  .../rust/rust-disable-outline-atomics.patch   | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust/rust-disable-outline-atomics.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-target.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-target.inc
> index 3f637b3ba5..bac743f66d 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-target.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-target.inc
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ require rust.inc
>
>  DEPENDS += "rust-llvm (=${PV})"
>
> +SRC_URI += "file://rust-disable-outline-atomics.patch"
> +
>  # Otherwise we'll depend on what we provide
>  INHIBIT_DEFAULT_RUST_DEPS:class-native = "1"
>  # We don't need to depend on gcc-native because yocto assumes it exists
> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust/rust-disable-outline-atomics.patch
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust/rust-disable-outline-atomics.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..fc99a06a6a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust/rust-disable-outline-atomics.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +rust: fix arm64 link failures when building rust apps
> +
> +Typical error when trying to build a rust app looks like:
> +  undefined references to `__aarch64_ldadd8_rel'
> +
> +The upstream rust commit
> +"add target feature outline-atomics"
> 0f9f241aac21bc77fb9e757da18207abefdc841d
> +has caused a number of such link failure regressions on platforms with
> aarch64
> +toolchains that are not able to cope with -moutline-atomics flag. This
> includes
> +musl toolchains [1] but some glibc toolchains also are not able to handle
> this
> +flag [2,3]
> +
> +OE gcc-cross-aarch64 is currently one of the latter, but when it *is*
> able to
> +handle outline-atomics this patch should go away, to take advantage of the
> +reported performance benefit.
> +
> +[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/git2-rs/issues/706
> +[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org/msg661738.html
> +[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830472
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [other]
> +
> +Signed-off-by: S. Lockwood-Childs <sjl@vctlabs.com>
> +
> +diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
> b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
> +index c2136f161..ca221eb4a 100644
> +--- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
> ++++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs
> +@@ -416,13 +416,14 @@ pub fn llvm_global_features(sess: &Session) ->
> Vec<String> {
> +     // -Ctarget-features
> +     features.extend(sess.opts.cg
> .target_feature.split(',').flat_map(&filter));
> +
> +-    // FIXME: Move outline-atomics to target definition when earliest
> supported LLVM is 12.
> +-    if get_version() >= (12, 0, 0)
> +-        && sess.target.llvm_target.contains("aarch64-unknown-linux")
> +-        && sess.target.llvm_target != "aarch64-unknown-linux-musl"
> +-    {
> +-        features.push("+outline-atomics".to_string());
> +-    }
> ++//    // FIXME: Move outline-atomics to target definition when earliest
> supported LLVM is 12.
> ++//    if get_version() >= (12, 0, 0)
> ++//        && sess.target.llvm_target.contains("aarch64-unknown-linux")
> ++//        && sess.target.llvm_target != "aarch64-unknown-linux-musl"
> ++//    {
> ++//        features.push("+outline-atomics".to_string());
> ++//    }
> ++
> +
> +     features
> + }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#159774):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159774
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87763768/1686489
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> alex.kanavin@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>