From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ua1-f42.google.com (mail-ua1-f42.google.com [209.85.222.42]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.28807.1623017193485950769 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:06:33 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pUrDBlnu; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.222.42, mailfrom: alex.kanavin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-f42.google.com with SMTP id p9so519743uar.3 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:06:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OBcrIz81TtI22WNzpk163iv0oV1NhhzL3tEgBjm6MmM=; b=pUrDBlnu92nTmpM0PQ9eNGlyiAOVklX/3zlD9dJbZ/NO9VHR0RI2ifMu/caIhcujKk PZk2CAMUBeQnocvu8lXRZzi6EzHLyPH6nkvs0A5gbkuvz0M50MfgYGSq1H0PZrV8OZq4 0nwPC47292LibJKl+IsPiY9rauxnvFB76kt3nnxTit1N3soHRI4Hw5g5+ntQqm66vX/E gKwKG5X2pK7e8k+oFQuUhCAiVcr7mI8zHBwFURdWmTqnAsJpLkLoNGZSsqYz+k8cGmkY QtvhdoJEnFRTlJ+qt4ogsjSypegUWPsZGt/7kWGDF/YiM8M4wArZDR97U6KLTv5I+N7E z7Ig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OBcrIz81TtI22WNzpk163iv0oV1NhhzL3tEgBjm6MmM=; b=qsM6T8FyZvnkVwWsJWzjzMBys2imdrNU6/oO3xo4ju20OT28ENIUL9e/ex42E4D0j8 Qtw8hB4XbHCSd/nW4+Suy7jkI7jrtU1PwscBwh5BqNtmqUVUw2wKR4Nh7BQ0LusGG5jM z12Jbl2TNGNeWx6xZpTKVgH8+q2oA8uZmQZzN+pHV7+TtVWMosjAzOsCLpLD4Z4cxpno tGZexBF8zEHKZmF9k3iQ48p13RewbXGMNe9NWaABtvkETmgc3iabhgJqOmeZx/IiavXs 26b4Nbgoqzr0m2rgLJ1VK2zw26wDHiV4fMokGahrvimmFC6qJiHLduLF5rN030//nPae PKtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OUMKxd8AUvgia5201W5SVvHPr1ohpIAA2c93fhNi55zDW1nzH lPx3yJhVpN7IC9Sw6bGqueOpofoFw37Dm+umTO8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7eF25S/1aNDCuE9RGarOtdThPwCvEgX3vYokXCJ0myf81Kcr0Nlx3JfPQ9dnJRK7dpPYyZ1x3wjXFvtYUAAQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1d4a:: with SMTP id d71mr6826856vkd.0.1623017192667; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:06:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210604091458.1381144-1-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <20210604091458.1381144-4-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <1685B658849E960A.4717@lists.openembedded.org> <50a73766-dc52-0600-a6cd-7ab422030782@gmail.com> <7e56d093ba6c1390cec71ef3a362abe84ce735bb.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <2ac70a7b01743192ae4ec42b2b1eee18becde25d.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: From: "Alexander Kanavin" Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 00:06:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] cmake: update 3.20.2 -> 3.20.3 To: Khem Raj Cc: Richard Purdie , OE-core , Michael Halstead , Bruce Ashfield Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003bbc4d05c42023a5" --0000000000003bbc4d05c42023a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 23:51, Khem Raj wrote: > > Good sleuthing. Can you find out if libseccomp is in play ? if so > what version of libseccomp is being used by cmake if it is libseccomp > < 2.4.2 then time64 syscall support won't be there unless > its backported to the older version. > >From what i could tell cmake does not use libseccomp, but centos8 could have some kind of syscall filtering in place. It would be good to try with a few older centos8 kernels. Alex --0000000000003bbc4d05c42023a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 23:51, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

Good sleuthing.=C2=A0 Can you find out if libseccomp is in play ? if so
what version of libseccomp is being used by cmake if it is libseccomp
< 2.4.2 then time64 syscall support won't be there unless
its backported to the older version.

Fr= om what i could tell cmake does not use libseccomp, but centos8 could have = some kind of syscall filtering in place. It would be good to try with a few= older centos8 kernels.

Alex
--0000000000003bbc4d05c42023a5--