Right, then don't bother with deb. The level of support for deb in Yocto is significantly less than for rpm/ipk, and we do not require feature parity for all three. Thanks, Alex On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 17:25, wrote: > Hello Alex, > > > > Seems to not be so quick to change for the deb packages. First I had > issues building the sdk on > the master branch as it runs some postinst scripts that leak out of the > yocto sandbox and into > the host system [1]. Not sure if that’s a recent regression as I don’t > normally use deb packages > in Yocto. > > > > Then I found that apt will fight over a lock file written into the > recipe-sysroots-native directory [2]. > I am not so familiar with apt-get to resolve that trivially. I’ll try to > re-visit it another day. > > > > Kind regards, > > Michael > > > > [1] > > Setting up nativesdk-shadow (4.8.1-r0) ... > > mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/usr/lib/opkg’: Permission denied > > dpkg: error processing package nativesdk-shadow (--configure): > > installed nativesdk-shadow package post-installation script subprocess > returned error exit status 1 > > > > [2] > > E: Could not get lock > /nvme/poky/build-deb/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-minimal/1.0-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/var/cache/apt/archives/lock > - open (11: Resource temporarily unavailable) > > > > -- > > *BMW Car IT GmbH* > Michael Ho > Spezialist Entwicklung – Build and Release Engineering > Lise-Meitner-Straße 14 > 89081 Ulm > > Tel.: ­+49-731-37804-071 > > Mobil: +49-152-54980-471 > Fax: +49-731-37804-001 > Mail: michael.ho@bmw-carit.de > Web: http://www.bmw-carit.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > BMW Car IT GmbH > Geschäftsführer: Kai-Uwe Balszuweit und Michael Böttrich > Sitz und Registergericht: München HRB 134810 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > *From: *Alexander Kanavin > *Date: *Monday, 11. January 2021 at 15:45 > *To: *"Ho Michael, JC-3UL" > *Cc: *OE-core > *Subject: *Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: allow do_populate_sdk in > parallel to do_rootfs > > > > If you can fix the deb packaging easily, then please do so, but it is not > mandatory, and don't spend too much time if it turns out to be a time sink. > > > > Alex > > > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 15:01, wrote: > > Hello Alexander, > > > > Did a quick test and it seems the rpm packaging classes don’t have this > issue. The rootfs_deb bbclass however has the same lock files like with > rootfs_ipk. > > Should I try to patch this too to keep them aligned? > > > > Kind regards, > > Michael > > > > -- > > *BMW Car IT GmbH* > Michael Ho > Spezialist Entwicklung – Build and Release Engineering > Lise-Meitner-Straße 14 > 89081 Ulm > > Tel.: ­+49-731-37804-071 > > Mobil: +49-152-54980-471 > Fax: +49-731-37804-001 > Mail: michael.ho@bmw-carit.de > Web: http://www.bmw-carit.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > BMW Car IT GmbH > Geschäftsführer: Kai-Uwe Balszuweit und Michael Böttrich > Sitz und Registergericht: München HRB 134810 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > *From: *Alexander Kanavin > *Date: *Monday, 11. January 2021 at 13:46 > *To: *"Ho Michael, JC-3UL" > *Cc: *OE-core > *Subject: *Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: allow do_populate_sdk in > parallel to do_rootfs > > > > Does deb/rpm packaging already have this feature? > > > > Alex > > > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 13:45, Michael Ho wrote: > > From: Michael Ho > > Switch do_populate_sdk for the ipk package manager to use a separate target > opkg config file and separate the lockfiles restricting do_rootfs and > do_populate_sdk from running in parallel. > > This way if an image recipe includes a dependency to do_populate_sdk by > default then it will run in parallel to do_rootfs saving time compared to > the > sequential execution. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ho > --- > meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 1 + > meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 4 ++-- > meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py | 6 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > index 79cb36c..d31dba0 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ IMAGE_PKGTYPE ?= "ipk" > > IPKGCONF_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg.conf" > IPKGCONF_SDK = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk.conf" > +IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk-target.conf" > > PKGWRITEDIRIPK = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-ipks" > > diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > index f1e0219..245c256 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ do_rootfs[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_ipk > do_package_qa" > do_rootfs[vardeps] += "PACKAGE_FEED_URIS PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS > PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS" > > do_rootfs[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock" > -do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock" > -do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock" > +do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock" > +do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock" > > OPKG_PREPROCESS_COMMANDS = "" > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > index 37af034..e2ca415 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ class PkgSdk(Sdk): > def __init__(self, d, manifest_dir=None): > super(PkgSdk, self).__init__(d, manifest_dir) > > + # In sdk_list_installed_packages the call to opkg is hardcoded to > + # always use IPKGCONF_TARGET and there's no exposed API to change > this > + # so simply override IPKGCONF_TARGET to use this separated config > file. > + ipkgconf_sdk_target = d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET") > + d.setVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET", ipkgconf_sdk_target) > + > self.target_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET") > self.host_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK") > > -- > 2.7.4 > > > > >