From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk1-f195.google.com (mail-vk1-f195.google.com [209.85.221.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3CD7FE5E for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w67so1977566vkf.1 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:47:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UfuhxppJxQZm2f/2JfEk93PsV8EOx/80nJzfcCd1/Bs=; b=TlQT6mJUEZxcIN/hNkPb+7kJxNX6cDJdHbxu3Se6SMpU1E/9FlXdqV01zPQI78AXO+ 9vPD0oO70RPHiz6unvX+Y+34XK2tmafRcB72GDHsIj+NBf6oLAYo5rW/ydNwypM1gDLV KCVlhkBtsRIt5m22izn6EtYV6QIpkD62YwufZzk/l9uzlJJj4P9y+FV9tyaCMgYZuBPk F1H8We3e5fyN80hbmNhpmrO+LPu3KM1nZXilAkNgWNGK15vHkMKUuo2C3gMx6rrtbr0w SE6gecuRtRTA7wO1Sm0VcHBRuwV+fQZcC4f0yiV1U/TeH2MKVc4HtVVBnVirR0D+Cus5 e1GA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UfuhxppJxQZm2f/2JfEk93PsV8EOx/80nJzfcCd1/Bs=; b=CSfffSauvxgATpxtBgaE6YRGv+i+c7QvacMJEHR4spXuydSJmcjY8XIX5g39EQM5IO PUINUS9d0/cxSmnZaGdsRXMjIoLo/Mrd5XZcIc5jEG8QqMegaz4LPEEcsQ4tJObqO5tS 1q4KT7jTHms2tKcg/Mw7jmu2PelW/bSw/FDLqhmesyDj5wVlCzAyoYVuDc0pCAKR2lf/ LoZyq4QBsqHlDWLwt+v8oDKU2BnuTnuZkUx5tEfx2gE4uHFXxmZJWlueOHe9Ewxx4Wis 3PQXesVG+KZuJ15CAE7+2lkEbeBzSeEkvBPndHTLqvpk0WRbnwO6AyQAPDRREolokbEL Vixw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7M5Jnr+TUuE4vSCAgNQ61JeEUAIbTmadyjuNmDyRzVYZggkeq qX+o6xNiwOERoXAJbnpqoLl4pn4Y8/Ca5ZutmSTJlOKd X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgiRfv3WeO93aF16CXD96FrH71mlXd+KcMEA0JLzFFAuX1QADeqSpySFQXtrpdq6QQkRrPNiLW9xd8ie5oiuU= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:7dcd:: with SMTP id y196mr6885452vkc.29.1578577641688; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:47:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200108132759.95603-1-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <20200108132759.95603-11-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <15ea8a58c140419c32f08e4ab6148677bb23e920.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <15ea8a58c140419c32f08e4ab6148677bb23e920.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Alexander Kanavin Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:47:10 +0100 Message-ID: To: Richard Purdie Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/28] ifupdown: update 0.8.22 -> 0.8.35 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:47:21 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000955239059bb53f50" --000000000000955239059bb53f50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 22:23, Richard Purdie < richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 14:27 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Remove inet-6-.defn-fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch as > > it is difficult to rebase and not clear if still necessary. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin > > --- > > ...efn-fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch | 403 ---------------- > > -- > > ...{ifupdown_0.8.22.bb => ifupdown_0.8.35.bb} | 11 +- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 409 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/files/inet-6-.defn- > > fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch > > rename meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/{ifupdown_0.8.22.bb => > > ifupdown_0.8.35.bb} (83%) > > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/305656/ > I had a closer look at how and where ifupdown recipe is used, and from what I see it isn't: every configuration is relying on busybox to provide the same utilities. That's why the failure is seen only in world builds :) Should we drop the ifupdown recipe? Alex --000000000000955239059bb53f50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 22:23, Richard Purd= ie <richard.purdie= @linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 14:27 = +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Remove inet-6-.defn-fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch as
> it is difficult to rebase and not clear if still necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
> ---
>=C2=A0 ...efn-fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch | 403 ------------= ----
> --
>=C2=A0 ...{ifupdown_0.8.22.bb =3D> ifupdown_0.8.35.bb} |=C2= =A0 11 +-
>=C2=A0 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 409 deletions(-)
>=C2=A0 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/files/inet-6-.defn= -
> fix-inverted-checks-for-loopback.patch
>=C2=A0 rename meta/recipes-core/ifupdown/{ifupdown_0.8.22.bb =3D>= ;
> ifupdown_0.8.35.bb} (83%)


http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/3= 05656/

I had a closer look at how a= nd where ifupdown recipe is used, and from what I see it isn't:
ev= ery configuration is relying on busybox to provide the same utilities. That= 's why the failure is seen only in world builds :)

Should we drop the if= updown recipe?

Alex
--000000000000955239059bb53f50--