Can't we achieve the same by abstracting the common part into a function
and defining the two tests explicitly?

Alex

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 21:26, Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.mail@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's substituted further down into
> def test_sbin_init(self, _, origInit):
>
> parameterized.expand generates two tests out of it. The string parameter
> is used as a suffix for the test, the rest is used as input parameters,
> i.e. the first test would be called with origInit=True, the second one with
> origInit=False.
>
> The sample output looks like this:
>
> 2021-11-15 20:21:15,740 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
> overlayfs.OverlayFSEtcRunTimeTests.test_sbin_init_0_original: PASSED
> (295.73s)
> 2021-11-15 20:21:15,740 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
> overlayfs.OverlayFSEtcRunTimeTests.test_sbin_init_1_preinit: PASSED
> (177.97s)
>
> Vyacheslav
>
> On 15.11.2021 21:20, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>
> I can't understand what is supposed to happen, perhaps because it's
> incomplete? There's
>
> @parameterized.expand([
> ("original", True),
> ("preinit", False),
> ])
>
> but where is that used?
>
> Alex
>
>
>