On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 16:16, Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 16:02 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > Sorry, but that is not a good answer. If the next version upgrade
> > is a pain because of those patches, I will actually make a patch
> > that drops them.
>
> I'm going to wade in on this at this point.
>
> systemd is a tricky one. Khem has been doing a good job keeping it
> working on musl and that is important to some set of our users so
> I'm going to continue to enable him and others to do that.
>
> I'm not sure the current patch approach cases a huge issue, worst
> case it gets broken and then fixed as just happened.
>

That's ok, but then I would suggest that systemd version updates do not
rebase the musl patches, and that is dealt with after the fact by those who
need the feature.

Alex