From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5C2C433EF for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com [209.85.208.177]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.52027.1658311129882382956 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 02:58:50 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GuCZtFf3; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.208.177, mailfrom: alex.kanavin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id k19so2414824lji.10 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 02:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f/7ujSQqYl/X/bnhOoq3q/4kBtn2PoaQm8BLwgjgxmU=; b=GuCZtFf3z1vlqO9Gpc1er2WF5MrfEzRZZEnrioJdhlsbPkin0bd8UKS9Mdn6+QvR1H /SjuDTYMuSl0JL1sqYJEiZzCs1VAgvG7BVWmLaZBA6mmrCFZAWhB3EsFJ3NP7JcOQbpz VQ8SZmjai3fx229Qn2g/tV3ZspwVzHpUP6OyX7g+xNTAa10CjSyDgwhvHA+23DiDr2qt zeqz7XbeZ2BgrTfE0MBEFs9WdUnsEvkLh38+hLo/lfCG1qZGeV4bNVoIDCL8Of+CNsUf hFf+Uqiw2z1TkdZOk1hetSxjchbpfzlAMuJ9z0ExEDZjwJZBnOrU7yPl4rr4XC8qMIxb r9Kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f/7ujSQqYl/X/bnhOoq3q/4kBtn2PoaQm8BLwgjgxmU=; b=2h5zK8gebdXx4Bqb4KZxxaIBbPe2MV/lx2CacvIW7Th/1hM6Jk6Cp0IyJ4QZDTjM86 kuCta0dmnudmSui3GIlPAflHYuhWHy3TpZuVtCGE1mKTZ2F3WDCkCeWlvuZ4Kl8t2LhK ZfAxsCrl9/ooPx6BtQjVudj6iJa63dK2UiCo1M6vYthlMQWIyYngxKBzEh9+2PnZkvpP eup3h2tryXSQFcCDBNrWPdeQ0Q3fiH/a0nlx1DZwr/1T4PJAI5kWQGkTMwVRdJf1WlhV XxZKmOZOoVC1jd3IO7uSYaWUMUUzHofd9HrfJo2eAkhe6xH7ZMA22diKjtkSFl5g0mgP sOiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/VOIaBJzl90fiXANpw5lkqIuhYjiCbOjSSivr7oMyPuZ6QgT3M eh/OIwKz+yoXJdpVD1TqZ4UbZEFbT3In0etOgtI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t20E2ofe6DqwfXfzJALQnV9IbuWPyftVglysLWMRAVFUI1qZwGJuqaPqE+iVlA/JSjzdD9fgv7ItA4wet996s= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a4a5:0:b0:25d:980f:8ba7 with SMTP id g5-20020a2ea4a5000000b0025d980f8ba7mr14773584ljm.513.1658311127976; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 02:58:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220720084442.2940187-1-alex@linutronix.de> <17037D268C38CE83.21682@lists.openembedded.org> <0A7591F9-3D0D-49E2-A067-67485A8B3B0D@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <0A7591F9-3D0D-49E2-A067-67485A8B3B0D@arm.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 11:58:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1) To: Ross Burton , Anuj Mittal Cc: Richard Purdie , OE-core , openembedded-architecture , Yocto-mailing-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:58:55 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/57590 On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 11:50, Ross Burton wrote: > Also, Intel should get to have an opinion on this. If they actually care= about x32 then they can help fix the issues, if they don=E2=80=99t then we= can easily switch to a platform that has support. Ok, let's ask Intel, specifically Anuj :-) Anuj, does Intel still care about x32, and would anyone notice if yocto drops x32 support from master branch? Alex