On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:55, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:

> I have to admit I'm guessing at what level of automated run-time testing
> we normally have today.  We sanity test a sysvinit+busybox image with
> networking, yes?  If so, we also do that on systemd and I assume with
> what I put for the systemd+busybox-free we also do there, yes?
>

I believe we test sysvinit+busybox, and systemd+busybox at runtime via poky
and poky-alt distro configs.

We also test systemd+busybox-free core-base-utils (without ifupdown), but
only as a build (no runtime tests). See
lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/imagefeatures.py.

Alex