From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C29CC432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 21:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4742071B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 21:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kmKi50nU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726747AbfKVVtC (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:49:02 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com ([209.85.217.66]:43714 "EHLO mail-vs1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726526AbfKVVtC (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:49:02 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id b16so5828266vso.10 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:49:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G62OPFVZIkBw55KC5/i/oEsvxB7myzhATw37jvrwcgc=; b=kmKi50nUtbizrYMKlVYwM7YMGAwXvfkyyo5Bm1BOfbzPF9NBHUXY35Ev8ubE0cF4cO QDSRLkR9+F50nai293m+QESDXbMNaePgcpDf8kVP7ntgb1oheHANKcBTh4fBrLK8t7gW LgvK1lmbXdSH8KbuuFYUd1509C/tqnQWu+gfmc5t/P9uROcCmnokh16BzuBFzVyTnn+O kOB+BCPnTppzXEF8Eg+d1HaY+5nqaf4HNblmhj/EPMe+0PNLl79uV4v3rOZqooYpwZO7 SKubBMtdZJ25CzICx2DtGXmpAq9lPwjfORxkw257f5A/PAJ4+jvcTP5xKDMT7JkcAJdK QFmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G62OPFVZIkBw55KC5/i/oEsvxB7myzhATw37jvrwcgc=; b=U6A7ZwS9tWyRub5Umny0JktAGbgox/ccjxaseau8vUYST/N3lUe/ji/KEvgnvLIw1+ o0sgKMw4aPUF/5gMl0s25+qg+njGFBG6UVE8mYFywfJzbHUnEDdAOvfIA0UxpGoaJZ54 ELFJXQeH5kGdS4CL5Twf/RK/obCz3l2/k17cMbUXBvQXSias2Xp3RBkhdyeMnNu7M977 1m/RGN7ODQCrwrdn4TAZLjJIumvv+TsIVncxyKET363UhIFCkFNyU7zCxM3CXKvBbeng +H6Z+dOEgpAcdhHLuSU0LXqad2hsCz0g7kIBtVsuFDnnCUNLL8whl21g9bCYKEHmkTRy PYEg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVetrP/tRSF9mxPHJW2RLAO6CtuNRxsL5yVNBRBgyMlG/N2WtzP St2qkOz4LZAxLgx6bCKP+6PaML4QmtK3IohvwCQ3CQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNnBQIPAg/ocMTNUo5QgZ4nq3hCTU3+CAWIlSCTCLSknSOApdpocEtL/woEuCkmrPosIy358RRow6UJs3y7io= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e9d6:: with SMTP id q22mr12165017vso.231.1574459339332; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:48:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191122072102.248636-1-zenczykowski@gmail.com> <20191122.100657.2043691592550032738.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20191122.100657.2043691592550032738.davem@davemloft.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=C5=BBenczykowski?= Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:48:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: inet_is_local_reserved_port() should return bool not int To: David Miller Cc: Linux NetDev , Eric Dumazet Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Maciej, please repost this series with a proper introduction "[PATCH 0/3]" posting > so that I know what this series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why > it is doing it that way. That's because the first two patches were standalone refactors, and only the third - one line - patch had a dependency on the 2nd. > That also gives me a single email to reply to when I apply your series instead of > having to respond to each and every one, which is more work, and error prone for > me.