Hi Steve,

Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> escreveu no dia quarta, 13/04/2022 à(s)
18:37:

> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:41 AM Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 13 April 2022 at 06:02:22 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > > Both runs completed and I'm still seeing success without the zlib
> patch:
> > >
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/5069
> > >
> > > and failure with the patch:
> > >
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/5070
> >
> > I'm certainly no expert with the autobuilder, but it looks like nothing
> was
> > actually compiled for both of those builds - everything came from the
> > sstate cache.
> >
> > I believe that Ralph's reproduction of the test failure without the zlib
> > patch was from a complete rebuild without anything coming from the sstate
> > cache.
> >
> > I suspect that if a PR bump or something similar that causes zlib and all
> > its reverse dependencies to be built were tested on top of the commit
> used
> > for build 5069 then the test failure would occur then as well and
> > exonerate the zlib patch.
>
> A valid point, let's see what happens with a PR bump:
>

I think that bumping the PR is not enough to rebuild a package.
The sstate cache needs to be invalidated and bumped as well
with HASHEQUIV_HASH_VERSION.

PR = "r1"
HASHEQUIV_HASH_VERSION .= ".1"

Jose


>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/5072
>
> I see plenty of rebuilds in process . . .
>
> Steve
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#164349):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164349
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90107518/5052612
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> quaresma.jose@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>

-- 
Best regards,

José Quaresma