From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94731C4708C for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 00:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E4E613BF for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 00:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234455AbhE1AgQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 20:36:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229761AbhE1AgO (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 20:36:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90DEC061574; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id v19-20020a0568301413b0290304f00e3d88so1977625otp.4; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dXpGjTuhJwdRDIKxoQcJr6oyH9WSthGNETSc4xMDJiU=; b=mDShOZJCbc9ZnRkk2LlbbSi09w/Ql99qc0RDXNWU7hUfKzZX6foOiRij32BVbIQvbt 4zFfs/6ksoeux2CqMGxOvTBk4Q09lMR+HKpmdacdGqV7mtcNSC6bvrnbAfjWY2Tbe488 yWHCp88x3MCUjStSj71LZXbrXpg2gLrvkm3AIcdTRhLAlIKKVl3SmMPonvkPr8FEfKb+ ktZRxodTbcgNBRYS+9yasC0iT/VFyl2Xped+x/2QyFliSDT6syrOa7SbR36IHvWdhMj9 sR+yPeowlGwrdaWcYo6eeNOlJg4skRhzhV68Y+fawuxCDimT8GQn9rOryalMd3N7IIYW EgXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dXpGjTuhJwdRDIKxoQcJr6oyH9WSthGNETSc4xMDJiU=; b=UuHmMyVGCufA0KyaUr4deuL5WjfZ4g3D2/iokmC2faoPIsre3ot9eqZ4KjBNvoplp4 qu60fzgitZ+LG6oce2wPDoJoB2tGIKcsJSsMbN3KDUAmYhwhorMKXLVy7GMnMDfFtCGp RlyErqz6Tz+I9Fe+YFpqJS5O8O+KBQ8EZYjrFmqmDEGJaKcpCPMU0+saHpeftZcCGyIH Nc0P27srMGt16dG1H6aSpJItnAQHDdDe9fDID5GkgDaJv14sAIzN0odMbiZjz61Ctmi8 l+Gs2KrLtkFBkzy7kmDY7AvQlp3qUH2DwdqITqMiL3LAGKGEPv/aj9J0SiVrISXUg0C5 DNmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aYPliif57XCkrSA++B5hFtdtjRCe64KfoamVrQWYIwISXOOS8 x+Q01uJpJ0dVrIbsJnrow9qLTrCKS6KbLWlLXOs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEcBwHj6vd/TqmuZNb80xYTokDdKd6XNumwURVReeBHpvw4YJ1X6m7fUzPJd/TgtRg1OB+4jszG60GapH0+5g= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6655:: with SMTP id q21mr4901572otm.185.1622162079228; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:34:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000000000000f3fc9305c2e24311@google.com> <87v9737pt8.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <0f6e6423-f93a-5d96-f452-4e08dbad9b23@redhat.com> <87sg277muh.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <87sg277muh.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> From: Wanpeng Li Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 08:34:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in x86_emulate_instruction To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Paolo Bonzini , syzbot , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , jarkko@kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kan.liang@linux.intel.com, kvm , LKML , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Sean Christopherson , steve.wahl@hpe.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 08:31, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, May 28 2021 at 01:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 28/05/21 00:52, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> > >> So this is stale for a week now. It's fully reproducible and nobody > >> can't be bothered to look at that? > >> > >> What's wrong with you people? > > > > Actually there's a patch on list ("KVM: X86: Fix warning caused by stale > > emulation context"). Take care. > > That's useful, but does not change the fact that nobody bothered to > reply to this report ... Will do it next time. Have a nice evening, guys!