Re: [PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Advancing the timer expiration on guest initiated write

[Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 01:16, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> >
> > Advancing the timer expiration should only be necessary on guest initiated
> > writes. Now, we cancel the timer, clear .pending and clear expired_tscdeadline
> > at the same time during state restore.
>
> That last sentence is confusing.  kvm_apic_set_state() already clears .pending,
> by way of __start_apic_timer().  I think what you mean is:
>
>   When we cancel the timer and clear .pending during state restore, clear
>   expired_tscdeadline as well.

Good statement. :)

>
> With that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
>
> Side topic, I think there's a theoretical bug where KVM could inject a spurious
> timer interrupt.  If KVM is using hrtimer, the hrtimer expires early due to an
> overzealous timer_advance_ns, and the guest writes MSR_TSCDEADLINE after the
> hrtimer expires but before the vCPU is kicked, then KVM will inject a spurious
> timer IRQ since the premature expiration should have been canceled by the guest's
> WRMSR.
>
> It could also cause KVM to soft hang the guest if the new lapic_timer.tscdeadline
> is written before apic_timer_expired() captures it in expired_tscdeadline.  In
> that case, KVM will wait for the new deadline, which could be far in the future.

The hrtimer_cancel() before setting new lapic_timer.tscdeadline in
kvm_set_lapic_tscdeadline_msr() will wait for the hrtimer callback
function to finish. Could it solve this issue?

    Wanpeng