From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:40753 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594Ab2AGVEM (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2012 16:04:12 -0500 Received: by wgbdr10 with SMTP id dr10so526166wgb.1 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:04:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <201201071127.06717.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 23:04:11 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20120107_220415_770842_0A46FA51) Subject: Re: suggestion for a reasonable value for /sys/module/iwlwifi/parameters/debug From: Emmanuel Grumbach To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toralf_F=F6rster?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 22:55, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: >> If I choosed 0x43ff my syslog message files exploded - and I'd like to trouble >> shoot a problem with my wlan at a ThinkPad T400 (iwlwifi, 5100 AGN controler). >> The symptoms are that 1-2 times in a hour the network stops working without >> any message in /var/log/messages (kernel 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.0 tested). >> >> Thanks for any advice >> -- > > For this kind of issues I added the TX_QUEUES debug flags, but I just > checked and it is not in 3.2. It is in John's wireless tree though. It > is bit 31: debug=0x80000000 > > BTW - John, I have tried many times to understand all this, but stupid > me, couldn't ever make it. How come a patch is in wireless which in my > understanding (probably wrong) is supposed to feed the current rc > cycle (meaning the 3.2-rcX which just ended) and not be in 3.2 stable > release ? Sorry for the ignorance... > Or maybe the wireless tree has already be recreated on top of Linus's tree (through Dave's tree) after he merged everything ?