From: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
cjb@laptop.org, balajitk@ti.com, vishp@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: convert from IP timer to hrtimer
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:08:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANfBPZ-VbkDRADNgecyXSqj3YH-mAZcihEm2YRrMW8_RWpORyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120821104248.GR10347@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:22:29AM +0530, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> omap hsmmc controller IP has an inbuilt timer that can be programmed to
> ^^^^^^^
> built-in
>> guard against unresponsive operations. But it's range is very narrow,
> ^^^^
> its
>
>
>> and it's maximum countable time is a few seconds.
> ^^^^
> its
>
Will fix.
>
>> Card maintenance operations like BKOPS and SECURE DISCARD and long
>> stream writes like packed command require timers of order of
>> several minutes.
>> So get rid of using the IP timer entirely and use kernel's hrtimer
>> functionality for guarding the device operations.
>> As part of this change, a workaround that disabled timeouts for
>> MMC_ERASE commands is removed, and the arbitary timing of 100ms
>> is used only when the timeout is not explicitly specified by core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index 9afdd20..8f7cebc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
>> #define CLKD_SHIFT 6
>> #define DTO_MASK 0x000F0000
>> #define DTO_SHIFT 16
>> -#define INT_EN_MASK 0x307F0033
>> +#define INT_EN_MASK 0x306E0033
>
> not related to this patch in particular, but it would be nice if this
> was converted to something more meaningfull, like ORing a bunch of bit
> defines.
>
Sure. Good to do now as part of the change.
>> #define BWR_ENABLE (1 << 4)
>> #define BRR_ENABLE (1 << 5)
>> #define DTO_ENABLE (1 << 20)
>> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ struct omap_hsmmc_host {
>> unsigned int dma_sg_idx;
>> unsigned char bus_mode;
>> unsigned char power_mode;
>> + unsigned int ns_per_clk_cycle;
>> int suspended;
>> int irq;
>> int use_dma, dma_ch;
>> @@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ struct omap_hsmmc_host {
>> int reqs_blocked;
>> int use_reg;
>> int req_in_progress;
>> + struct hrtimer guard_timer;
>> struct omap_hsmmc_next next_data;
>>
>> struct omap_mmc_platform_data *pdata;
>> @@ -455,10 +457,6 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_enable_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> else
>> irq_mask = INT_EN_MASK;
>>
>> - /* Disable timeout for erases */
>> - if (cmd->opcode == MMC_ERASE)
>> - irq_mask &= ~DTO_ENABLE;
>> -
>> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, STAT, STAT_CLEAR);
>> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, irq_mask);
>> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, irq_mask);
>> @@ -508,6 +506,9 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_clock(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
>> && time_before(jiffies, timeout))
>> cpu_relax();
>>
>> + if (ios->clock)
>> + host->ns_per_clk_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, ios->clock);
>> +
>> omap_hsmmc_start_clock(host);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -824,7 +825,7 @@ omap_hsmmc_xfer_done(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
>> omap_hsmmc_request_done(host, mrq);
>> return;
>> }
>> -
>> + hrtimer_cancel(&host->guard_timer);
>> host->data = NULL;
>>
>> if (!data->error)
>> @@ -859,8 +860,11 @@ omap_hsmmc_cmd_done(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
>> cmd->resp[0] = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, RSP10);
>> }
>> }
>> - if ((host->data == NULL && !host->response_busy) || cmd->error)
>> + if ((host->data == NULL && !host->response_busy) || cmd->error) {
>
> could just go ahead and make this check uniform by:
>
> if ((!host->data && !host->response_busy)) || cmd->error)
>
Ok.
>> + if (cmd->error != -ETIMEDOUT)
>> + hrtimer_cancel(&host->guard_timer);
>> omap_hsmmc_request_done(host, cmd->mrq);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -992,7 +996,7 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_do_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host, int status)
>> hsmmc_command_incomplete(host, -EILSEQ);
>>
>> end_cmd = 1;
>> - if (host->data || host->response_busy) {
>> + if (data || host->response_busy) {
>
> This doesn't seem like it belongs to $SUBJECT...
>
I thought is was a small fix which didn't warrant a separate patch though.
>> end_trans = 1;
>> host->response_busy = 0;
>> }
>> @@ -1292,41 +1296,35 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_start_dma_transfer(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void set_data_timeout(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> - unsigned int timeout_ns,
>> - unsigned int timeout_clks)
>> +static void set_guard_timer(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> + unsigned long timeout_ms, unsigned long timeout_ns,
>> + unsigned int timeout_clks)
>> {
>> - unsigned int timeout, cycle_ns;
>> - uint32_t reg, clkd, dto = 0;
>> + ktime_t gtime;
>> + unsigned int sec, nsec;
>>
>> - reg = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL);
>> - clkd = (reg & CLKD_MASK) >> CLKD_SHIFT;
>> - if (clkd == 0)
>> - clkd = 1;
>> + sec = timeout_ms / MSEC_PER_SEC;
>> + nsec = (timeout_ms % MSEC_PER_SEC) * NSEC_PER_MSEC + timeout_ns;
>>
>> - cycle_ns = 1000000000 / (clk_get_rate(host->fclk) / clkd);
>> - timeout = timeout_ns / cycle_ns;
>> - timeout += timeout_clks;
>> - if (timeout) {
>> - while ((timeout & 0x80000000) == 0) {
>> - dto += 1;
>> - timeout <<= 1;
>> - }
>> - dto = 31 - dto;
>> - timeout <<= 1;
>> - if (timeout && dto)
>> - dto += 1;
>> - if (dto >= 13)
>> - dto -= 13;
>> - else
>> - dto = 0;
>> - if (dto > 14)
>> - dto = 14;
>> - }
>> + nsec += timeout_clks * host->ns_per_clk_cycle;
>> + gtime = ktime_set(sec, nsec);
>>
>> - reg &= ~DTO_MASK;
>> - reg |= dto << DTO_SHIFT;
>> - OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, SYSCTL, reg);
>> + hrtimer_start(&host->guard_timer, gtime, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +enum hrtimer_restart omap_hsmmc_timedout(struct hrtimer *gtimer)
>
> static ?
>
Right!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 18:52 [PATCH 00/10] Assorted MMC / OMAP HSMMC patches Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 01/10] mmc: core: Add TRANsfer state to non-HPI state Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 02/10] mmc: debugfs: Print ext_csd in ascending order Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] mmc: omap: remove unused variables and includes Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/10] mmc: omap: fix mmc_omap_report_irq to use dev_dbg macros Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: remove unused vars and includes Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: remove access to SYSCONFIG register Venkatraman S
2012-08-21 15:38 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-08-27 11:04 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: consolidate flush posted writes for HSMMC IRQs Venkatraman S
2012-08-21 15:21 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-08-27 11:02 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: consolidate error report handling of HSMMC IRQ Venkatraman S
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: convert from IP timer to hrtimer Venkatraman S
2012-08-21 10:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-22 10:38 ` S, Venkatraman [this message]
2012-08-22 11:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Move to Maintained state in MAINTAINERS Venkatraman S
2012-08-21 10:43 ` [PATCH 00/10] Assorted MMC / OMAP HSMMC patches Felipe Balbi
2012-08-27 23:02 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANfBPZ-VbkDRADNgecyXSqj3YH-mAZcihEm2YRrMW8_RWpORyQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=svenkatr@ti.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishp@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.