All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:26:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANgfPd-Y6Z=icq4ajhesu23AOZPNRVq+KNQ-2kyFHyVA6sx5Xg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220226001546.360188-7-seanjc@google.com>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:16 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Assert that mmu_lock is held for write by users of the yield-unfriendly
> TDP iterator.  The nature of a shared walk means that the caller needs to
> play nice with other tasks modifying the page tables, which is more or
> less the same thing as playing nice with yielding.  Theoretically, KVM
> could gain a flow where it could legitimately take mmu_lock for read in
> a non-preemptible context, but that's highly unlikely and any such case
> should be viewed with a fair amount of scrutiny.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 5994db5d5226..189f21e71c36 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -29,13 +29,16 @@ bool kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
>         return true;
>  }
>
> -static __always_inline void kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm,
> +/* Arbitrarily returns true so that this may be used in if statements. */
> +static __always_inline bool kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm,
>                                                              bool shared)
>  {
>         if (shared)
>                 lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>         else
>                 lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +       return true;
>  }
>
>  void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> @@ -187,11 +190,17 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
>  #define for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root, _as_id, _shared)         \
>         __for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(_kvm, _root, _as_id, _shared, ALL_ROOTS)
>
> -#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id)                             \
> -       list_for_each_entry_rcu(_root, &_kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link,         \
> -                               lockdep_is_held_type(&kvm->mmu_lock, 0) ||      \
> -                               lockdep_is_held(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock)) \
> -               if (kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) {              \
> +/*
> + * Iterate over all TDP MMU roots.  Requires that mmu_lock be held for write,
> + * the implication being that any flow that holds mmu_lock for read is
> + * inherently yield-friendly and should use the yielf-safe variant above.
> + * Holding mmu_lock for write obviates the need for RCU protection as the list
> + * is guaranteed to be stable.
> + */
> +#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id)                     \
> +       list_for_each_entry(_root, &_kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link)     \
> +               if (kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(_kvm, false) &&    \
> +                   kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) {              \
>                 } else
>
>  static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> --
> 2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-28 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-26  0:15 [PATCH v3 00/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common iterator for walking invalid TDP MMU roots Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 19:08   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-02 19:51     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03  0:57       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 19:50   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong/misleading comments in TDP MMU fast zap Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 23:15   ` Ben Gardon
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 23:59   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03  0:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03  1:20       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03  1:41         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03  4:50           ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 16:45             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 23:17   ` Ben Gardon
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 23:26   ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01  0:11   ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-03 18:02   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 18:08   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 18:24   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 18:32   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 18:34   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 18:37   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw vals Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 18:47   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01  0:19   ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-03 18:50   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01  0:32   ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-03 21:19   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 21:24     ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 23:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01 18:21   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-01 19:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01 20:12       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02  2:13         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 14:54           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 17:43             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap roots in two passes to avoid inducing RCU stalls Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01  0:43   ` Ben Gardon
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01 17:57   ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-02 17:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 17:35     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 18:33       ` David Matlack
2022-03-02 18:36         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 18:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 18:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 19:33         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 20:14           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 20:47             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-02 21:22               ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 22:25                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE before making the SPTE Sean Christopherson
2022-03-01 18:06   ` Ben Gardon
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN on any attempt to atomically update REMOVED SPTE Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] KVM: selftests: Move raw KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION helper to utils Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] KVM: selftests: Split out helper to allocate guest mem via memfd Sean Christopherson
2022-02-28 23:36   ` David Woodhouse
2022-03-02 18:36     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-02 21:55       ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] KVM: selftests: Define cpu_relax() helpers for s390 and x86 Sean Christopherson
2022-02-26  0:15 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] KVM: selftests: Add test to populate a VM with the max possible guest mem Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANgfPd-Y6Z=icq4ajhesu23AOZPNRVq+KNQ-2kyFHyVA6sx5Xg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.