From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD2CC07E9D for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232903AbiI0N5r (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:57:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57082 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231788AbiI0N5e (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:57:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9E9146624 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id sd10so20923638ejc.2 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:57:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=wWmUplSIGLHqTXKQn830L50TUzZDqD8/z7vsdgzJtC8=; b=ASPc4e4Zgz+eUs+S97BVl9bWv1qQHONmQi/YJX/JkSaYK7VZNlfBpN3xjDpkxBlAcO 3+KsOEMxUWYn7fmwxeAG26DK0u+8OxwYt7hRPOdiXen80HLSDDDpkXRjA8PjpZsu/xC+ quhabbvUiOP/51xY0nOK54k2j1xBOaAbw4n10= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=wWmUplSIGLHqTXKQn830L50TUzZDqD8/z7vsdgzJtC8=; b=JwZr988nGN7FieS2BaCz2t7TTRTIzzYq4QjMYtJstdIvQvvO8IfMpxUC+bHPk4oMkM W1VLNGcf3Y4fg4ax0cQj9HaaOoLUTBDBdbKU1FUS+3nW/59JNH2zKllFzuCDnEQTv4od m3Tj7f9X7A6dSs5nIYrc4Zr99Y1XmaG5dM1LbzJ1ngmSC61VqiqBoMnxGpvoNejEysiG c4huhGTXfqPfd1wIooaq5Km43HQrF94hWxtZLnPzzHlbUeu+FjBVPI0r4jjWVFQrraJ3 HJKvvqRUtPyYPMBQHsb7pOZprAQ8ybg1lekh0MjNXwVqmCWBwzIsPabft/qT7SX0SIDr VZAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0YffOibjk2nQYtyTOg0pg7Fw12vQvTUpUx/TTebj8zNAxs4KC6 dHX/TYxjeumvx/ztOUqeFvvbpC9XLofml5umZUg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4sAP+5pL/221gknuJxd+fEdErxWbLCfFCS1SJ2hLmgH5ebcw4UIZwLovSJ7rf5JxjwtQwu0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9702:b0:782:6b6e:9e25 with SMTP id jg2-20020a170907970200b007826b6e9e25mr20747987ejc.258.1664287044456; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com (mail-ej1-f52.google.com. [209.85.218.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m7-20020a056402050700b00457a92f8ad6sm1218961edv.28.2022.09.27.06.57.24 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id dv25so20816696ejb.12 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:57:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2699:b0:781:a473:9791 with SMTP id t25-20020a170906269900b00781a4739791mr23280968ejc.644.1664287043807; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:57:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220926001230.65b0683c@deangelis.fenrir.org.uk> <20220926163449.380463ca@deangelis.fenrir.org.uk> <20220927135459.7d614076@deangelis.fenrir.org.uk> <20220927143009.125b8ccc@deangelis.fenrir.org.uk> <20220927144247.71ad1b8f@deangelis.fenrir.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20220927144247.71ad1b8f@deangelis.fenrir.org.uk> From: Ricardo Ribalda Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:57:12 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Foscam W21 webcam not working in Fedora 37 with kernel-5.19.11 To: Brian Morrison , Linux Media Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 15:42, Brian Morrison wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:34:51 +0200 > Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > > > I am afraid that you need to ask in the fedora forum/ML why they are > > not authorizing the device by default. Maybe some user reported some > > malfunction with that device? > > So this is not a kernel-related issue? I don't know how this sort of > authorization is controlled, perhaps you know? > It is not kernel related. Every distro handles that differently: https://docs.kernel.org/usb/authorization.html Maybe someone on the list knows how fedora does it. A fast google search shows: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/security_guide/sec-using-usbguard Try on the fedora mailing list. > -- > > Brian Morrison -- Ricardo Ribalda