From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F09C4332F for ; Mon, 30 May 2022 13:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236293AbiE3NCD (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2022 09:02:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236299AbiE3NCB (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2022 09:02:01 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3061717E1C; Mon, 30 May 2022 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id q203so11299583iod.0; Mon, 30 May 2022 06:02:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/nsX7tQgFVjCVndQ6RpFV7BObhww0aFphEST3Aew1pU=; b=aDBnKozUQpAbtuN5D/ooDBBqSx3Y+oo5MQ+1QeE2crNOB4+uZi4F8AFaQo9IURBPMv TVWtenQ8DPSkeu06Zak5ks2S0Dg84W67tc+vI5DtTswEgZk0k2+gKNpJrlE5EJbOodqG Vdxm0mdvIGW6kx8eUFHGJWjG24kkF6b+xVMNWdVNSCFR2Bmjq0viGo30qySCSC8imz1j 5z4u2g9ZUnnau7guKEFPonzFCeCgumyuk0EIouAa59SVc8aqIe1q1Xtsd+OmaJdST0aP 8BEyiBJL9ImKKd5CZTG7axLZNZNcTTOKhiZMNC0fAeljoM4c/Avg9Rhmy9lgOHrQzCx2 JA0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/nsX7tQgFVjCVndQ6RpFV7BObhww0aFphEST3Aew1pU=; b=79lmhcP105YbKJX1Hk/34Yo9ey9MeCwVB4u6uWwL/kMOLxkzFIwCWnvCH+0mN477vG KCW6bQG7yugO8SvKiSgDrbZ8AZazFEEK7c6QKRITk6VW0Ogi4Sl63RFJGh7wvYyTpp7U Ss6nEZ3O0vXpFPFu0zXYJ/gbXmtsiRB36qTLmwvHHQpZaW5exZZAHcdHIzueMIcyjIdZ R09Ndkb2MIvTTVCpTOEyA01GaMBaEcLBeKg+bkWEnt+iYq/zmcKTTObyBg4zAYSNJlwX /ho8Tk3UmI8ZeEUvmc69sy8wavfJ7FGwopOkhcHGgDIAJXppukDc7aAKB0KDgkJmShmG iaKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53173F8XARlvS0wlmU8bg6jwagNgORAzswyymofaIUxlbb9LFhWg D+TUcHj7ahVJMuvEBPc4kZwI08mmhqn1XjBGNr8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/KcdushmmWd5Wmx13C1o+XFxVQFOFTt9BakFoqOPc639maIlLVqG2CA9llEfhnfiqOLefeStVd6eXaJtnvLM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:f89:b0:32e:89f4:e150 with SMTP id h9-20020a0566380f8900b0032e89f4e150mr27709726jal.308.1653915717905; Mon, 30 May 2022 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220523020209.11810-1-ojeda@kernel.org> <20220523020209.11810-4-ojeda@kernel.org> <459385ee7ccf4fcf3e22d4a11b4f438d648422bf.camel@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <459385ee7ccf4fcf3e22d4a11b4f438d648422bf.camel@kernel.org> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 15:01:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/25] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512 To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: David Howells , Miguel Ojeda , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , rust-for-linux , linux-kernel , Kees Cook , Petr Mladek , Alex Gaynor , Wedson Almeida Filho , Gary Guo , Boqun Feng , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Joe Lawrence , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > The honest answer: I don't actually remember what I was thinking > (other stuff stole my focus) but my comment neither makes much > sense to me. Please just ignore it, and apologies for causing > confusion. No apologies needed! > There's something I'm looking into in my spare time right now. > I'm experimenting with interfacing keyring types to Rust. The > first step, I guess, is to provide a Rust abstraction for > assoc_array. > > I've skimmed through the patch set and have now *rough* idea of > patterns and techniques. My opens are more on the process side > of things since there's no yet mainline subtree. Thanks a lot for taking a look and taking the initiative. > If I send a patch or patch sets, would this be a good workflow: > > 1. RFC tag. > 2. In the cover letter denote the patch set version, which was > used the baseline. Sounds good to me. Alternatively, you can use a `--base=` pointing to one of the commits in our `rust` branch. Cheers, Miguel