From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0335B168 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id b15so25640663iow.4 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 08:36:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wlgMwgUURXW+TTDZA6S4Idudu9EAKKfOtIGAm3Vkn+o=; b=tG/66vTm1JSjoG8epcT1Syr2HGvq4vovAnLLZZUH6ho++h9SOGFIM1QzonmXQNMYsH TNSpZJxgcSVGQv7ZtkHn7Oivx4xqtFoK+B/O1IZN8RnqnjyTh81/BMzQu8KrNKgYKjpX ZYN58lYq6e55lnyXVO57moJOejvJ4iS9KmBrcLXnePzCdoVUqmb+RgtU0nt3svPOybdm 0vANkvS4RvTTJWKC8MXz9C/sEX8IFtBvPm+lJc4E9O6cJ7WqSQIdLLc3/PaocjsCSzzm Tss5iTsNFwjvHJAJI1o1WMnZ+Y5mLRhiHl+1QcntUieyBJ2yfFg6b05+tNRbdCOKIkM9 kpvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wlgMwgUURXW+TTDZA6S4Idudu9EAKKfOtIGAm3Vkn+o=; b=SO3U1jZZ2cSR6xIdFVHpnPDXi77YmiGAdm3GpaJQC4znknASEFghXG8V/MHLGmGeHv KFx7/FQiCKmAHdgSGc0JCzjdeEt8TOqInuVyPXKKvP6EU44nYRTUj28PQuCwKKIExWC6 5JlcGm4Fr2ABJtssuD2eexiH1ChL8oMWoNIybEh7WriGpb5wQWegx50OwzoAGdObEE9N PQZfucBkPpjgbs1gI/+BZS6j1n4ZGS7VccUI1HUG6JMjQ9Qyvd+6udFPKKg+RgmIkD/i YZ64mlq04mcqUejq1OXp10vZO9aGEtRBW3hFIUjOTQPl2x8O8px5/NGp6ugRI5jM8q3+ r+DA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OMH0Y9wJeUk6uL6mqmw3qeR5q86KcqbK10iFuRYUNl6OyEooD 9z/pxcPL0X301ZprP8B8n1/fk8Eh+ZOcUZ7mr5s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyftLHbu360PBT++X9BbRqpz1LrH/nmZeYDyuGT8DwrQaf8+cMZAZ0+tp9/+xF2y9DjhiZ9QKO9Po805XCi0E= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2c85:: with SMTP id i5mr1280997iow.91.1625585807290; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 08:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <19e0f737a3e58ed32758fb4758393c197437e8de.camel@HansenPartnership.com> In-Reply-To: From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:36:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [TECH TOPIC] Rust for Linux To: Sasha Levin Cc: James Bottomley , Leon Romanovsky , Linus Walleij , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:02 PM Sasha Levin wrote: > > How do you see this working on the -stable side of things? It's hard > enough to get review for C code, the amount of people who would do a > second review in the context of a -stable release would be non-existant. Hopefully, by the time Rust code is fixed through the -stable channel, more people will have more knowledge on Rust. In the worst case, we could have either the maintainers of the abstractions review the -stable patches if they are complex enough (but then why would they be in -stable? i.e. the same applies for any complex C change, no?) or people with Rust knowledge looking at -stable patches. Cheers, Miguel