From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (mail-io1-f44.google.com [209.85.166.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2537F2C80 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id d125so26638797iof.5 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:45:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2vzxjST9VYYskOzjypmiYVHx0fvZtSsG8PABlYBv/lo=; b=TpzToV6EG5NUMGvXt9S6KBsFTYzNG1TBuUj7D8E7KHRuTeoKxkz/1cLf9ok80ducUC rLnxwzxNRLFR9u+OTJDabjXniDjDaNj1IPessl3Zx5KNjj/vmwL1+14E0DSVC0G74AQv 0l5l8723o4ZWIJp7ff+Ue7Dkli9FKp4w7K5PPsJbZHe2T083X5u6P6uPd1jsTsK3C779 Z+wWqFbfItnh06U0SzgLfTdHOsh+jSQGM6UhB1OWLhYCBoCcsINdbmfdfUR9rp0hpf1L PxWAkqAyjM1iFZPjXlSnH3cCq+38EvDfdU34oX7/A/AF82ztBU72PQrOKv+k9grakUny Rdyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2vzxjST9VYYskOzjypmiYVHx0fvZtSsG8PABlYBv/lo=; b=fbMAcZ7MJxPm9303icQ+dDOVSpcPAT9ygwRLmEPmL8JIXDD2eb9vAy/tGKYLAuuIis AxmVegepEEgdOIT5U5q/laMSP7CqZXENFdrUxTGLB9Wstu33DKH6XK38o+JnlrGetIES hCaOxAAZzwrbV3qhmV6qIkg3rAQfluA1BqY6CnvewoU0zOEc6qozr8Tv6eT2fLCCpSc1 QRwxMlitbmZ+c96WG4VeaG8+fguHy1GxNWN9e/XHBsyK6lKOt1uITI0IVWKWYCY+TE8N zSI0Z/avSfwSgbd5enRqr+pQDZVFqU2QfSgy1vLzDMiSJJwjpLSshaHSNTF8Rofv42BK +m9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Hl6xIbuN8CB54obhuXUCaF5fMqgAZyl2GN/GIyA6L833cub/L nMhwV2Bgb8NwCmK8XaHeWHbZBLph9bHBjm2vYOU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKe9Xa4H2Z7T3/fu3kurLNBai+i5fhrTTk8e89yITi5PcdWxHypOm7vYfTQCEx4PjAb85K5bGwKERsh6jHdrU= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9d56:: with SMTP id k22mr1299385iok.177.1634769913268; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211020200039.170424-1-keescook@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20211020200039.170424-1-keescook@chromium.org> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:45:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler-gcc.h: Define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ under hwaddress sanitizer To: Kees Cook Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Arnd Bergmann , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Andrew Morton , Marco Elver , Will Deacon , Arvind Sankar , Masahiro Yamada , llvm@lists.linux.dev, Ard Biesheuvel , Luc Van Oostenryck , linux-kernel , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:00 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > I'm intending to take this via my overflow series, since that is what introduces > the compile-test regression tests (which found this legitimate bug). :) Not sure if there is a particular reason I was in the `To` field (please let me know if so), but the patch sounds good to me! Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda Cheers, Miguel