All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@broadcom.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 2/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace chip context structure with pointer
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:09:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANjDDBiSLY55v=cA+gMC6QFAqxUxiiFCy3y3_Rw9vF+v40LgDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200125180252.GD4616@mellanox.com>

On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:33 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:52:40AM -0500, Devesh Sharma wrote:
> >  static void bnxt_re_destroy_chip_ctx(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev)
> >  {
> > +     struct bnxt_qplib_chip_ctx *chip_ctx;
> > +
> > +     if (!rdev->chip_ctx)
> > +             return;
> > +     chip_ctx = rdev->chip_ctx;
> > +     rdev->chip_ctx = NULL;
> >       rdev->rcfw.res = NULL;
> >       rdev->qplib_res.cctx = NULL;
> > +     kfree(chip_ctx);
> >  }
>
> Are you sure this kfree is late enough? I couldn't deduce if it was
> really safe to NULL chip_ctx here.
With the current design its okay to free this here because
bnxt_re_destroy_chip_ctx is indeed the last deallocation performed
before ib_device_dealloc() in any exit path. Further, the call to
bnxt_re_destroy_chip_ctx is protected by rtnl.
following is the exit sequence anyewere in the driver control path
bnxt_re_ib_unreg(rdev); --->> the last deallocation in this func is
destroy_chip_ctx().
bnxt_re_remove_one(rdev); -->> this is a single line function just to
put pci device reference
bnxt_re_dev_unreg(rdev); -->> the first deallocation in this func is
ib_device_dealloc().


>
> IMHO you should free it as part of the ib device dealloc.
>
> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-27  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-24  5:52 [PATCH for-next 0/7] Refactor control path of bnxt_re driver Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 1/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor queue pair creation code Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24 11:23   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-25 17:03     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 18:50       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27  7:39         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-30  6:04           ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 17:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-27  8:13     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  8:16       ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  9:27         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27  9:26       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 11:31         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-30  6:04       ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-30 13:37   ` Parav Pandit
2020-01-30 16:03     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 2/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace chip context structure with pointer Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 18:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-27  7:39     ` Devesh Sharma [this message]
2020-01-27  8:04       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 11:17         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-28 20:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-30  6:05         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 3/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor hardware queue memory allocation Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 4/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor net ring allocation function Devesh Sharma
2020-01-26 14:29   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27  7:40     ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27  8:02       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 11:25         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-27 12:44           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-27 14:14             ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-28 18:09               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-28  0:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-28  2:43         ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-28 18:09           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-29  8:29             ` Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 5/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor command queue management code Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 6/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor notification " Devesh Sharma
2020-01-24  5:52 ` [PATCH for-next 7/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor doorbell management functions Devesh Sharma
2020-01-25 18:04 ` [PATCH for-next 0/7] Refactor control path of bnxt_re driver Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-27  7:39   ` Devesh Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANjDDBiSLY55v=cA+gMC6QFAqxUxiiFCy3y3_Rw9vF+v40LgDQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=devesh.sharma@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.