From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752186AbeEQOIz (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 10:08:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40064 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751319AbeEQOIx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 10:08:53 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq0BKFIik0eXgwMJ4t6DtxbDoIyGQSzy4Q+l1aycE9gSYVzx8r4I37Se03MdjNZYDl1dRvtV0xETGeCxk2RfN0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180517070407.GA13919@kroah.com> References: <20180516235007.3951-1-atull@kernel.org> <20180517070407.GA13919@kroah.com> From: Alan Tull Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 09:08:11 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] fpga api changes and kernel-doc fixup To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Moritz Fischer , linux-kernel , linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:49:53PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: >> I'm posting these all together because they are interdependent. >> >> Patches 1-4 are a repost of v4 of the FPGA api change. >> >> Patch 5 is a repost of adding SPDX to my fpga code >> >> Patch 6-12 update the fpga kernel-doc documentation and move >> existing .txt fpga documentation to driver-api ReST documents. >> >> Patch 13 is a minor documentation fix >> >> Patch 14 updates MAINTAINERS for the new driver-api/fpga directory > > Are these just for review, or do you feel they are good enough for me to > queue up for 4.18-rc1 now? I think the first five are good to go, but that's your call. Patches 1-4 are the API reworked following your suggestions. Patch 5 (SPDX) = I haven't heard any feedback on, but I think it's good. So I think patches 1-5 are good (if you agree). The rest are new to the mailing list and haven't been reviewed/acked by anybody else yet. I generally avoid posting reviewed/unreviewed patches together, sorry. I just didn't want to open the possibility of patches being applied out of order and the issues that can cause. Alan > > thanks, > > greg k-h