All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Qing Huang <qing.huang@oracle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>,
	Tarick Bedeir <tarick@google.com>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@mellanox.com>,
	Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@oracle.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mlx4_core: restore optimal ICM memory allocation
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:50:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+KRHvsxH9Gs4QhtMt4Ex2OH2h120gxjYkBf1_27O27_g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c87db444-266d-eb76-d8d5-d8a0c11038b1@oracle.com>

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:30 PM Qing Huang <qing.huang@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/29/2018 9:11 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Commit 1383cb8103bb ("mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks")
> > brought a regression caught in our regression suite, thanks to KASAN.
>
> If KASAN reported issue was really caused by smaller chunk sizes,
> changing allocation
> order dynamically will eventually hit the same issue.

Sigh, you have little idea of what your patch really did...

The KASAN part only shows the tip of the iceberg, but our main concern
is an increase of memory overhead.

Alternative is to revert your patch, since we are now very late in 4.17 cycle.

Memory usage has grown a lot with your patch, since each 4KB page needs a full
struct mlx4_icm_chunk (256 bytes of overhead !)

Really we have no choice here, your patch went too far and increased
memory consumption quite a lot.

My patch is simply the best way to address your original concern, and
not increase overall overhead.

( each struct mlx4_icm_chunk should be able to store
MLX4_ICM_CHUNK_LEN pages, instead of one page of 4KB )

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-30 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-30  4:11 [PATCH net] mlx4_core: restore optimal ICM memory allocation Eric Dumazet
2018-05-30 13:49 ` Tariq Toukan
2018-05-30 20:30 ` Qing Huang
2018-05-30 20:50   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-05-30 21:08     ` Qing Huang
2018-05-30 21:30       ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-30 23:03         ` Qing Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANn89i+KRHvsxH9Gs4QhtMt4Ex2OH2h120gxjYkBf1_27O27_g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=danielj@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qing.huang@oracle.com \
    --cc=tarick@google.com \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yanjun.zhu@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.