From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3326AC19F2A for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235805AbiHCHmw (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 03:42:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236006AbiHCHmq (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 03:42:46 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1135.google.com (mail-yw1-x1135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D042420F4C for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 00:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1135.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31f445bd486so162861417b3.13 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:42:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KCC1H22JfcFImFZ8f0/O3OvqoGicHHaYF6oOYt/EeNg=; b=LKDP6HYoD8gOHFhVvDAqBjfzNneb5oJAdTQQPGsnUZQ4ARkPv9mOuO98zVOUSCQC8t RgGYIfmeIOdI5hr5u4KfY+TISS1uglXNW1FkWOMrBe9y3zcUXVTb73Y29uGeRoOpJu5I nBAO1JxRM1VzjY7nFC21oYS+V3LA25oFwu8MDnzU/L+uUP/zHdEXVtHcq1UVXCDOYiig OoJpLIq+QjTl3uPNiaSav+uE/EKfDHIxRuGavFetxeR8B3rEgT2mEiqaSez62PVBnNa0 RWCY0SU4ht8E9rT39rAIt//aMHZagmCqFXlM59FpE+lR5U9+BJAr87pOK/KHGXlp5lGB 62kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KCC1H22JfcFImFZ8f0/O3OvqoGicHHaYF6oOYt/EeNg=; b=HtphTbestHRZzB9aaNwU6Xjh1HDl407W67qT2dUU0ZDtC0G75rxMUm/TGqa91u2BVH Mulzry+00Xwgkhdd0RokWO4aUQsirYOSrGr6TCPnK4j8j/tvJvYk8+zvjSZu7Oz40vOK SxWsn7WYbMS4GK64Fve6e4wu49aIgtiOIwMJiVqabi72f1/cmR0fQfHKeXmRpEhKkNmR KZ+VFZcc8wKYYVK6MUYI7cQKI47fZAVm7sezvRNQRqJl4vh76NRYTdg08Ha/WQjn0dKD v8MHcNdnOs4p4hZpW3ynSz52YO5B4pF4DLW7xoJ256+QfAP/4SW6VyvfGX8lEK9TAe4z Qx/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3H15qLnJIHEKqon6zcXmtVcYbXTonRciWA2MFHn7y2z6T2b/Ri vb8AcIic/cgI5Ul1DxkBaTmKYz1vuStdqBuTfkvs7Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7L9rliVyJ4YzP7LfPWbRwPNWb50DdUKo95gURH0wNt0ydiIT/0OaD9ijOV9atpnPVnuvrTmfDgANf/+tjySKA= X-Received: by 2002:a81:1204:0:b0:322:7000:4ecb with SMTP id 4-20020a811204000000b0032270004ecbmr21960785yws.47.1659512561838; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:42:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220802151932.2830110-1-broonie@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220802151932.2830110-1-broonie@kernel.org> From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 00:42:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree To: broonie@kernel.org Cc: David Miller , Networking , Jakub Kicinski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:19 AM wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: > > net/ax25/af_ax25.c > > between commit: > > d7c4c9e075f8c ("ax25: fix incorrect dev_tracker usage") > > from the net tree and commit: > > d62607c3fe459 ("net: rename reference+tracking helpers") > > from the net-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > diff --cc net/ax25/af_ax25.c > index 5b5363c99ed50,bbac3cb4dc99d..0000000000000 > --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c > +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c > @@@ -102,7 -102,8 +102,8 @@@ again > ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); > s->ax25_dev = NULL; > if (sk->sk_socket) { > - dev_put_track(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker); > + netdev_put(ax25_dev->dev, > - &ax25_dev->dev_tracker); This part seems wrong. Commit d7c4c9e075f8c only changed the two spots, one in ax25_release() and one in ax25_bind() > ++ &ax25->dev_tracker); > ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); > } > ax25_cb_del(s); > @@@ -1065,7 -1066,7 +1066,7 @@@ static int ax25_release(struct socket * > del_timer_sync(&ax25->t3timer); > del_timer_sync(&ax25->idletimer); > } > - dev_put_track(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25->dev_tracker); > - netdev_put(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker); > ++ netdev_put(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25->dev_tracker); > ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); > } > > @@@ -1146,7 -1147,7 +1147,7 @@@ static int ax25_bind(struct socket *soc > > if (ax25_dev) { > ax25_fillin_cb(ax25, ax25_dev); > - dev_hold_track(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC); > - netdev_hold(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC); > ++ netdev_hold(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC); > } > > done: