From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02CBC433F5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8514B610C7 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229607AbhJ2PAd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:00:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229501AbhJ2PAc (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:00:32 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8758C061570 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id o12so24968805ybk.1 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:58:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Jr8ArlXibLhBUCnJ+nTKbwdecMoXfNfv0SlCR1Npzhk=; b=UNeZL7iOzx3q33R6nnZrnQVPkcq7TLsPp5XynS6KYKXIH1dO2FxvfeMN43lGn9Myw2 85DXFQWLSe0wlOdhRM89lvLZ97kuTyz+uG8fhZyVn+R+b2NP8cT0yjYIWns9ZUmwFEVW podHoCjRdZF74ntXpIRcJYRV5TAWiNpQ6DKjHzESIZQMYwu7PBlrg4VfcRndC/1CgU9l O/nsiBfuQiJUwsmfsSY9gYR2NFVTp74ix+VETvtiNPP3X7urU99Gl8wBO3ic6BB9PUpy QSOgW68qbmkh1kvz4SNc3yAxwPXXbxubKHrSZHLJtyt9+0LYErOAf6Eri498KVhTtPn/ A6Kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Jr8ArlXibLhBUCnJ+nTKbwdecMoXfNfv0SlCR1Npzhk=; b=XSyLSdlE1iJtDAE156SstBLaClk0ISUtYyzVHcbs6GOIqk2dh2B2fe8SQKNfpii00T rtd2ggGvGqYUF3rFqIeRKJH1gj9crZU+xmpKH820NUv625gX5AnZJT7VKUKawHbUyzzR xnIuyZfbOfie2xOIlgjvReElVBSMxioPLHUb7aanjCivH79V26cBygc4hXDyAELLZt5i SGMnTHSrLT8j7vxZyTB0p30pCL2szJUc8iosst3JCcmUb60WWvDtl4AjrqNWu27dY7s1 y6b5hO2PiwB3u+SlKlkdSKGUOHTdASC1/Hd/fq0iBhSuky+6fyBVxC6HbThh9XE5gTgA hJXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pczqd+EmxKt/SseuIr2eQh0lcMxQRH3V2vdaclFFpB6EgyTQI T2G15C/f1vigISeQeWLy7gFyHl8ycrdLKV9SbXnFjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzl5od2K9+0M93lEwjaodHYYKeVaHGMcCae6GFMnIyRiBkkR+YMO+qZ6L1SaSC0Lrdm9j4FijQ9YoAEhRL68YQ= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:783:: with SMTP id b3mr11790588ybq.328.1635519481918; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211028191500.47377-1-asadsa@ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:57:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: avoid under-utilization with ce_threshold at low link rates To: Neal Cardwell Cc: Asad Sajjad Ahmed , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , Ingemar Johansson S , Tom Henderson , Bob Briscoe , Olga Albisser Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 7:53 AM Eric Dumazet wrote: > Setting ce_threshold to 1ms while the link rate is 12Mbs sounds > misconfiguration to me. > It is like using a ce_threshold of 1usec on a 10Gbit link. About all packets would get CE marked.