Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake.conf: Add sdl-config to HOSTTOOLS if using host SDL

[Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>]

Hi Patrick,

On 27 June 2017 at 20:38, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 20:24 +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> The original problem was that bitbake would print out the error:
>> "libsdl-native is set to be ASSUME_PROVIDED but sdl-config can't be
>> found in PATH. Please either install it, or configure qemu not to
>> require sdl.", if "libsdl-native" was in ASSUME_PROVIDED even if the
>> host has sdl-config in its PATH.
>>
>> This occurred really early for a clean build and bitbake would bail
>> out. The sanity check is in meta/classes/sanity.bbclass.
>
> I've not hit that problem, probably because the sanity check was not run
> again when I changed ASSUME_PROVIDED. I can reproduce it in a clean
> build directory without conf/sanity_info.
>
> I think extending HOSTTOOLS merely to satisfy sanity.bbclass is the
> wrong solution to the problem. It makes sdl-config available to all
> recipes, which is unnecessary and potentially introduces back host
> contamination.
>
> It is unnecessary because the qemu recipe has special code that enables
> the use of the host SDL when told to do so via ASSUME_PROVIDED.
>
> Can you come up with a better solution, probably by patching
> sanity.bbclass?

I can't think of any at this stage. Feel free to post a patch if you
come up with something better.

>
> --
> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>
> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>
>
>

Regards,
Jonathan