From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07E9C10F03 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9CF218B0 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727346AbfDYIp3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:45:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:40546 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725965AbfDYIp2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:45:28 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y49so4790374qta.7 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 01:45:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rxh5UXQJvULZ3n30+PzSL5PPQmBybHhGbCpXeflXtJc=; b=dShLA27EwhKmuiN87VhPYKmhV7j11cJu8+uO39RSg8o1Preg6GGDxuW9VwR4GQYPfe V1uKprQhrgQY52MTIy1/BwMmCZV7pAiuGpXNxiSgjYrr8FVvw/PDqFztp3YRUnihN/A3 W25Sn+QFdElsmjKh4aRanwjllQeUpwiYoDjcnNJAn6CVZfa9C7oMDjKFVbxT79sw9vYp 0b52ULk32kl/oOgrmTKDj1Eft8KJi5VTIykkRnjT3QGusX3x5mCIOmZamsTHuj2ACb4Q 7ww5MTP7oQiThQNWxfcZAzsbOl5lFl4QCpZDtwFfNZ6oH+ih/9qC90/VUKpRaIb8orDL mHag== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWUWqxM60FkkZt7g0dhGHF1TGb3MxRK+nxWdAspHWZaBDpFppTI oMN01NAfnr8tcjTGqaUcfghoedp6TojZFodnDKUb3w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4AQqpVJryb9exQ3Flt9Br8s+Iman3ChDhxAtRr6MSe78TOUZuUiOi4GnDqfaVWPoh/FJ2cIMWrX2gftWs8HA= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:247c:: with SMTP id d57mr30370397qtd.308.1556181927516; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 01:45:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181205004228.10714-1-peter.hutterer@who-t.net> <20181205004228.10714-8-peter.hutterer@who-t.net> In-Reply-To: From: Benjamin Tissoires Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:45:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] HID: logitech: Enable high-resolution scrolling on Logitech mice To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_VUCHENER?= Cc: Harry Cutts , Peter Hutterer , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" , Dmitry Torokhov , Jiri Kosina , Linus Torvalds , Nestor Lopez Casado , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:25 AM Clément VUCHENER wrote: > > Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 09:40, Benjamin Tissoires > a écrit : > > > > Hi Clément, > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:34 PM Clément VUCHENER > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > > > I tried again to add hi-res wheel support for the G500 with Hans de > > > Goede's latest patch series you've just merged in for-5.2/logitech, it > > > is much better but there is still some issues. > > > > > > The first one is the device index, I need to use device index 0 > > > instead 0xff. I added a quick and dirty quirk (stealing in the > > > QUIRK_CLASS range since the normal quirk range looks full) to change > > > the device index assigned in __hidpp_send_report. After that the > > > device is correctly initialized and the wheel multiplier is set. > > > > Hmm, maybe we should restrain a little bit the reserved quirks... > > But actually, .driver_data and .quirks are both unsigned long, so you > > should be able to use the 64 bits. > > Only on 64 bits architectures, or is the kernel forcing long integers > to be 64 bits everywhere? Damnit, you are correct, there is no such enforcement :/ > > > > > > > > > The second issue is that wheel values are not actually scaled > > > according to the multiplier. I get 7/8 full scroll event for each > > > wheel step. I think it happens because the mouse is split in two > > > devices. The first device has the wheel events, and the second device > > > has the HID++ reports. The wheel multiplier is only set on the second > > > device (where the hi-res mode is enabled) and does not affect the > > > wheel events from the first one. > > > > I would think this have to do with the device not accepting the > > command instead. Can you share some raw logs of the events (ideally > > with hid-recorder from > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools)? > > I already checked with usbmon and double-checked by querying the > register. The flag is set and accepted by the device and it behaves > accordingly: it sends about 8 wheel events per step. OK, that's what I wanted to see. > > hid-recorder takes hidraw nodes as parameters, how do I use it to > record the initialization by the driver? You can't. But it doesn't really matter here because I wanted to check what your mouse is actually sending after the initialization. So if I read correctly: the mouse is sending high res data but evemu-recorder shows one REL_WHEEL event every 7/8 clicks? Cheers, Benjamin > > > Le mer. 19 déc. 2018 à 21:35, Benjamin Tissoires > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:57 AM Clément VUCHENER > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 15 déc. 2018 à 15:45, Clément VUCHENER > > > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 14 déc. 2018 à 19:37, Harry Cutts a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Clement, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 05:47, Clément VUCHENER > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, The G500s (and the G500 too, I think) does support the "scrolling > > > > > > > > acceleration" bit. If I set it, I get around 8 events for each wheel > > > > > > > > "click", this is what this driver expects, right? If I understood > > > > > > > > correctly, I should try this patch with the > > > > > > > > HIDPP_QUIRK_HI_RES_SCROLL_1P0 quirk set for my mouse. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info! Yes, that should work. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, it is not that simple. I get "Device not connected" errors for > > > > > > both interfaces of the mouse. > > > > > > > > > > I suspect the device is not responding because the hid device is not > > > > > started. When is hid_hw_start supposed to be called? It is called > > > > > early for HID_QUIRK_CLASS_G920 but later for other device. So the > > > > > device is not started when hidpp_is_connected is called. Is this > > > > > because most of the device in this driver are not real HID devices but > > > > > DJ devices? How should non-DJ devices be treated? > > > > > > > > Hi Clement, > > > > > > > > I have a series I sent last September that allows to support non DJ > > > > devices on logitech-hidpp > > > > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=16359). > > > > > > > > In its current form, with the latest upstream kernel, the series will > > > > oops during the .event() callback, which is easy enough to fix. > > > > However, I am currently trying to make it better as a second or third > > > > reading made me realized that there was a bunch of non-sense in it and > > > > a proper support would require slightly more work for the non unifying > > > > receiver case. > > > > > > > > I hope I'll be able to send out something by the end of the week. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Benjamin