From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c; helo=mail-pg1-x52c.google.com; envelope-from=venture@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="APrHBil8"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43yrDg3QxXzDqS9 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 03:03:31 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id z10so5139159pgp.7 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:03:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rzx6fZb92L0fNwuQ3F12ZphNTswDc3pVHlaYMsnAQno=; b=APrHBil8KcnRPFXrbF6PdWXRzSbAqLg74bqMgUBALGnj6o5wZdxfn0SRhDFAI9iknr ilwy4ATyKYnpw4jjAbV+apvIX9+6rJB9bpfF99NGAA2VZkUwbTBim4LQe+hr4yXRTfzO gACKUjRg9Ugy+KyeNZiKDYj7o/ycQCv349GqI5OABu1tny2PjSCW/wFJtJ5gLcrxKUBg /k1jaQEHfqqygheHJj4EUTuPWUV9OO513G0i59+APmHhQROFnLX7hp0C5681IKmhqMw1 co+o1aHOcWs9IvLHlXsKXKjTACENRivYb3F8OO69FXhBanWl6n/02y8BtREgEwYK4wpN Iiow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rzx6fZb92L0fNwuQ3F12ZphNTswDc3pVHlaYMsnAQno=; b=p3CWe/SyzquH13pmvjq8fLHS6dNsctEt37MD50G02ZlmLw4LCKHTB40ooNLsfmZ0+b Ce7gPNIfISfqy3lB1wjh0OyzYmUuper1YLlMc5BZOraWHEIWfbOv0K7PJlf1RKMXbq7w vQvvmpYh9WwnoT21kUopn8pgtbRbify5rhCh4U8FKm8cO9GmIhcIt55n70shfZe7yCGA B5cpnP6LRHqBM5tKuUJSwiN7729qLGuiS9a7HSijUB9XLIMMPROJieRQQgjP2VtLveXx /NfRLfy3yGPricry00KH7Q/gsRXXF1tXfCGCqN+duIK9MPvk5IM/ZdxpWGKj5gMh2ze4 VoWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaC6506JQNtWM4VUpBxxTVEcc10VRM6YYpWd7gQI1dEcEsWaMXC CoDJ9iQy1EqymUofvAYClKL8ZV4IEqX6wd4sVci4XDpkNYw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbzTmw2I2zDWUFHRoBbrvKdnkk+pdvC/9FEW3XKIA5AWN59lUDr4ulzBg8Wx1Ihg6unHUj7ukm0DklXL4GBCK4= X-Received: by 2002:a62:7086:: with SMTP id l128mr37333329pfc.68.1549901008499; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:03:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Venture Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:03:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Host-side tools To: OpenBMC Maillist , Brad Bishop Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:03:32 -0000 Brad, It's my understanding that host-side tools that cooperate with bmc-side tools should be in the same repo, hence why the host-side blobs stuff is in phosphor-ipmi-flash. However, if I add any dependencies to the configuration for the BMC-side, those get in the way of configuring for the host-side. Would it not make sense to sometimes have it split? And if so, I would like to propose creating two repos, a blobs library host-side, and a flash tool host-side repo, so those can be neatly split and not have anything in their configuration file that's really bmc-side specific, like ipmid, or phosphor-dbus-interface, or something. Thoughts? Patrick